You find two companies with identical $10 billion market caps. Same size, right?
Not necessarily.
One has $5 billion in cash. The other has $5 billion in debt. If you bought both companies outright, one would cost you $5 billion less than the other.
This is why enterprise value exists—and why professional investors use it instead of market cap for most valuation work.
Market Cap: The Headline Number
Market capitalization = Share Price × Shares Outstanding
It's the total value of a company's equity—what the stock market says the company is worth to shareholders.
Example
| Company | Share Price | Shares Outstanding | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | $185 | 15.4B | $2.85T |
| Microsoft | $420 | 7.4B | $3.11T |
| NVIDIA | $880 | 2.5B | $2.20T |
Market cap is useful for:
- Size classification (large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap)
- Index weighting (S&P 500, Nasdaq-100)
- Quick comparisons between similar companies
Market cap only measures equity value. It ignores debt, cash, and other factors that affect the true cost of owning a business.
Enterprise Value: The Acquisition Price
Enterprise Value = Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash & Equivalents
EV represents what it would actually cost to buy the entire company—equity holders, debt holders, and all.
Why Add Debt?
When you acquire a company, you inherit its obligations. A company with $10B market cap and $5B in debt costs you $15B total—you pay shareholders $10B for their shares, then you're responsible for $5B in debt.
Why Subtract Cash?
Cash on the balance sheet offsets the cost. If you buy a company for $10B and it has $3B cash, your effective cost is $7B—you immediately get the cash back.
The Formula Expanded
code-highlightEnterprise Value = Market Cap + Total Debt (short-term + long-term) + Minority Interest + Preferred Stock - Cash & Cash Equivalents
For most purposes, the simplified version works:
code-highlightEV = Market Cap + Debt - Cash
Side-by-Side Comparison
Let's compare two real scenarios:
Company A: Cash-Rich Tech Company
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $50B |
| Total Debt | $2B |
| Cash | $15B |
| Enterprise Value | $37B |
EV is 26% lower than market cap. You're buying $50B of equity but getting $15B in cash back (minus $2B debt).
Company B: Leveraged Industrial
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $50B |
| Total Debt | $30B |
| Cash | $5B |
| Enterprise Value | $75B |
EV is 50% higher than market cap. Same equity value, but you're taking on $25B net debt.
Same market cap. Very different true costs.
When to Use Each
Use Market Cap For:
| Use Case | Why |
|---|---|
| Index comparisons | Indices weight by market cap |
| Size classification | Industry standard for categorization |
| Equity returns | Stock performance is equity-based |
| Quick screening | Fast way to filter by size |
Use Enterprise Value For:
| Use Case | Why |
|---|---|
| Valuation ratios | EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, EV/FCF |
| Comparing companies | Normalizes for capital structure |
| M&A analysis | Represents actual acquisition cost |
| Cross-sector comparisons | Different industries use different leverage |
Rule of thumb: Use market cap for size, use EV for value.
EV-Based Valuation Ratios
Enterprise value unlocks the most useful valuation ratios:
EV/EBITDA
The gold standard for comparing companies across capital structures.
code-highlightEV/EBITDA = Enterprise Value / EBITDA
Why it works:
- EBITDA is pre-debt (before interest expense)
- EV includes debt
- Apples-to-apples comparison regardless of how a company is financed
| EV/EBITDA | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < 8x | Potentially undervalued (or struggling) |
| 8-12x | Fair value for most industries |
| 12-20x | Growth premium or quality business |
| > 20x | High-growth or speculative |
EV/Revenue (EV/Sales)
Used for high-growth or unprofitable companies where EBITDA doesn't exist.
code-highlightEV/Revenue = Enterprise Value / Annual Revenue
| EV/Revenue | Typical Use |
|---|---|
| < 1x | Asset-heavy, low-margin businesses |
| 1-3x | Mature businesses |
| 3-10x | Growing software/tech |
| > 10x | Hypergrowth SaaS, speculative |
EV/FCF (Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow)
The purest measure—what you pay for actual cash generation.
code-highlightEV/FCF = Enterprise Value / Free Cash Flow
Lower is better. A company trading at 10x EV/FCF generates cash equal to 10% of its enterprise value annually.
Why P/E Ratio Falls Short
The P/E ratio uses market cap (price = market cap per share), not EV. This creates problems:
Problem 1: Ignores Debt
| Company | Market Cap | Debt | P/E |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | $100B | $0 | 20x |
| B | $100B | $50B | 20x |
Same P/E, but Company B has $50B more obligations. EV/EBITDA would reveal this.
Problem 2: Cash Distorts Earnings
A company with $20B in cash earning 4% interest adds $800M to net income. This lowers P/E artificially—the business itself might be expensive.
Problem 3: Capital Structure Games
Companies can manipulate P/E by:
- Taking on debt to buy back shares (lower share count, higher EPS)
- Holding excess cash (interest income boosts earnings)
EV-based ratios cut through these distortions.
Real-World Example: Tech Giants
Let's look at how EV changes the picture for major tech companies:
| Company | Market Cap | Debt | Cash | EV | EV vs MC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | $2.85T | $111B | $62B | $2.90T | +2% |
| Microsoft | $3.11T | $47B | $81B | $3.08T | -1% |
| Alphabet | $2.15T | $14B | $111B | $2.05T | -5% |
| Meta | $1.45T | $18B | $65B | $1.40T | -3% |
| Amazon | $1.95T | $67B | $87B | $1.93T | -1% |
Key insight: Alphabet's true enterprise value is 5% lower than its market cap because of its massive cash pile. If you're comparing Alphabet to a debt-heavy competitor using market cap, you're not getting the full picture.
EV in M&A: The Acquirer's Perspective
When companies acquire other companies, they think in EV terms:
Acquisition Math
Target: $10B market cap, $3B debt, $1B cash
Acquirer pays:
- $10B to shareholders (the market cap)
- Assumes $3B debt obligation
- Receives $1B cash
Total cost = $10B + $3B - $1B = $12B (the EV)
This is why acquisition premiums are often quoted as "X% premium to enterprise value" rather than market cap.
Why Cash Matters in Deals
A company with lots of cash is more attractive because:
- You get the cash back immediately
- Lower effective acquisition price
- Cash can fund integration costs
A company with lots of debt is less attractive because:
- You inherit the obligations
- Higher effective price
- May need to refinance or pay down debt
Common EV Mistakes to Avoid
Mistake 1: Using EV/EBITDA for Banks
Banks' debt is their raw material (deposits). Adding it to market cap doesn't make sense. Use P/E or P/B for financials.
Mistake 2: Ignoring Cash Quality
Not all cash is equal:
- Trapped overseas cash (less accessible)
- Working capital cash (needed for operations)
- Restricted cash (contractual limitations)
True "excess cash" is what's left after operational needs.
Mistake 3: Forgetting Operating Leases
Post-2019 accounting rules capitalize operating leases on the balance sheet. Some EV calculations add these as debt. Be consistent in your comparisons.
Mistake 4: Snapshot vs. Trend
EV changes as:
- Stock price moves (market cap changes)
- Company takes on or pays down debt
- Cash position fluctuates
Always use current data, and track trends over time.
Quick Reference: EV Formulas
| Metric | Formula | Use For |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Value | MC + Debt - Cash | Base calculation |
| EV/EBITDA | EV ÷ EBITDA | Cross-company valuation |
| EV/Revenue | EV ÷ Revenue | Unprofitable growth companies |
| EV/FCF | EV ÷ Free Cash Flow | Cash generation valuation |
| EV/EBIT | EV ÷ Operating Income | Capital-intensive businesses |
Screening with EV Metrics
Here's how to use EV-based metrics in stock screening:
Value Screen (Low EV/EBITDA)
Criteria:
- EV/EBITDA < 10
- EBITDA margin > 15%
- Debt/EBITDA < 3
- Market cap > $1B
Finds reasonably valued businesses with solid profitability and manageable debt.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Criteria:
- EV/Revenue < 5
- Revenue growth > 20%
- Gross margin > 50%
- Net cash position (debt < cash)
Finds growing companies that aren't overpriced relative to their sales.
Cash-Rich Opportunities
Criteria:
- Cash > 20% of market cap
- EV/EBITDA < 12
- Positive free cash flow
Finds companies where cash provides a significant margin of safety.
Screen by EV metrics instantly
Stock Alarm Pro includes EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, and other enterprise value metrics. Filter the S&P 500 by valuation metrics that professionals use.
Start Free TrialKey Takeaways
Market Cap:
- Total equity value (price × shares)
- Use for size classification and quick comparisons
- Ignores debt and cash
Enterprise Value:
- True cost to acquire the business
- Market Cap + Debt - Cash
- Use for valuation ratios and M&A analysis
When comparing companies:
- Same market cap ≠ same value
- High debt increases true cost
- High cash decreases true cost
- EV normalizes for capital structure
The professional edge:
Most retail investors focus on P/E ratios and market cap. Professionals focus on EV-based metrics because they reveal the true cost of owning a business, not just its equity. Understanding this distinction is fundamental to serious valuation work.