Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Brightstar Lottery operates state-licensed lottery systems and gaming terminals across multiple US jurisdictions, generating revenue through ticket sales commissions and terminal placement fees. The company benefits from regulated monopoly positions in its contracted states but faces revenue volatility tied to consumer discretionary spending and jackpot cycles. Recent performance shows margin expansion despite flat revenue, suggesting operational efficiency improvements or favorable contract renegotiations.
BRSL operates under long-term exclusive contracts (typically 5-15 years) with state lottery commissions, earning revenue as a percentage of gross ticket sales (typically 6-12% commission) plus fixed management fees. The business model features high barriers to entry due to regulatory licensing requirements and established infrastructure, creating quasi-monopolistic positions in contracted jurisdictions. Pricing power is limited by state contract terms but protected from direct competition during contract periods. The company's 46.5% gross margin reflects the capital-light nature of lottery operations once infrastructure is deployed, with primary costs being technology maintenance, retail network support, and regulatory compliance.
State contract renewals and new jurisdiction wins (multi-year revenue visibility)
Same-store lottery sales growth driven by jackpot cycles and consumer spending patterns
Gaming terminal placement expansion in existing retail networks
Regulatory changes affecting lottery operations or online gaming competition
Margin expansion from operational efficiency or favorable contract renegotiations
Online and mobile lottery expansion by state operators could disintermediate third-party system providers, reducing BRSL's role to technology vendor with lower margins
Sports betting and iGaming legalization diverts consumer gambling dollars away from traditional lottery products, particularly among younger demographics
Regulatory changes allowing direct state operation of lottery systems could eliminate private contractor model in certain jurisdictions
Contract rebid risk when existing state agreements expire, with competitors (IGT, Scientific Games) offering aggressive pricing or superior technology platforms
Consolidation among lottery system providers could create larger competitors with better economies of scale and technology investment capacity
State budget pressures may force contract renegotiations with less favorable economics for operators
High leverage (4.94x D/E) creates refinancing risk and limits financial flexibility for contract bids requiring upfront capital investment
Low current ratio (0.74) indicates potential working capital constraints, particularly if state payment terms extend or jackpot payouts spike
Covenant compliance risk if revenue declines persist, potentially triggering accelerated amortization or restricted distributions
moderate-to-high - Lottery participation exhibits counter-cyclical characteristics during mild downturns (lower-income consumers seek aspirational wins) but becomes pro-cyclical in severe recessions when discretionary income contracts sharply. Gaming terminal revenue is more directly tied to consumer spending patterns and retail foot traffic. The -0.7% revenue decline amid recent economic uncertainty suggests sensitivity to consumer confidence and discretionary spending capacity.
Moderate sensitivity through two channels: (1) Higher rates increase financing costs on the 4.94x debt/equity leverage, compressing net margins despite strong operating performance. (2) Rising rates reduce consumer discretionary spending capacity, particularly among lower-income demographics that represent core lottery customers. The 0.74 current ratio indicates potential refinancing needs where rate environment matters. However, long-term contracted revenue provides some insulation from rate-driven demand volatility.
Moderate - The high debt/equity ratio (4.94x) creates refinancing risk in tight credit markets, though strong FCF generation ($0.9B on $2.6B market cap) provides debt service capacity. Consumer credit conditions indirectly affect lottery spending, as tighter credit reduces discretionary income for lower-income households. State budget health also matters, as fiscal stress could pressure contract economics or payment terms.
value - The 1.0x P/S, 5.6x EV/EBITDA, and 34.3% FCF yield suggest deep value characteristics despite execution risks. The 123% net income growth and 146% EPS growth indicate potential turnaround appeal. High leverage and negative recent returns (-23.5% 1-year) attract distressed/special situations investors rather than growth or quality-focused funds. The regulated monopoly characteristics and cash generation appeal to value investors seeking mispriced assets with hidden operational improvements.
moderate-to-high - The -23.5% one-year return and -13.8% three-month decline indicate elevated volatility, likely driven by leverage concerns, contract renewal uncertainty, and consumer spending sensitivity. The 4.94x debt/equity amplifies equity volatility to operational and macro changes. Quarterly earnings likely show high volatility due to jackpot timing and seasonal patterns in lottery sales.
