Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
KKR is a leading global alternative asset manager with $601B AUM across private equity, credit, real assets, and hedge funds. The firm generates revenue through management fees (1-2% of AUM) and performance fees (carry) when investments exceed return hurdles, typically 8% IRRs. Stock performance is driven by fundraising momentum, deployment rates into buyouts and infrastructure, and realization activity that crystallizes carried interest.
KKR operates a scaled alternative asset platform collecting predictable management fees on $601B AUM while earning asymmetric carried interest when fund investments exceed 8% IRR hurdles. The business model benefits from permanent capital vehicles (BDCs, infrastructure funds) that provide fee stability, while private equity realizations drive lumpy but high-margin carry revenue. Competitive advantages include $15B balance sheet for co-investments (aligning interests with LPs), global origination capabilities across 20+ offices, and operational value-creation platform (KKR Capstone) that drives portfolio company EBITDA improvements of 15-25%. Fee-paying AUM growth of 15-20% annually through fundraising creates compounding management fee base.
Fundraising velocity and fee-paying AUM growth (target 15-20% annually) - new fund closes immediately boost management fee run-rate
Realization activity and carry crystallization - large PE exits (IPOs, strategic sales above cost basis) trigger performance fee recognition
Deployment pace into new deals - dry powder deployment at attractive entry multiples (8-12x EBITDA) drives future carry potential
Public market valuations - NAV per share marked quarterly based on public comps; multiple compression reduces book value
Credit spreads and leveraged finance markets - tighter spreads enable larger buyouts and credit fund deployment
Fee compression from passive alternatives and secondaries market - LP pressure to reduce 2-and-20 model, particularly in liquid credit strategies
Regulatory scrutiny of private equity fee structures, conflicts of interest, and portfolio company labor practices - potential SEC rules on fee transparency and clawback provisions
Denominator effect reducing LP allocations - when public equity declines, PE becomes oversized in portfolio, forcing LPs to reduce commitments to rebalance
Intensifying competition from Blackstone ($1.1T AUM), Apollo ($696B), and Carlyle for mega-deals and LP capital - larger competitors have greater balance sheet capacity for co-investments
Direct lending competition from BDCs and private credit platforms eroding traditional PE returns - widespread availability of non-bank financing reduces operational improvement requirements
Mega-cap tech companies (MSFT, GOOG) acquiring assets directly in infrastructure and real estate, bypassing financial sponsors
$15B+ balance sheet concentrated in illiquid PE and credit investments - mark-to-market volatility impacts book value and regulatory capital
1.87x debt-to-equity primarily from CLO financings and corporate debt - refinancing risk if credit markets dislocate, though largely non-recourse
Clawback obligations if early fund distributions are later reversed by poor subsequent realizations - potential cash outflows to LPs
high - Private equity returns depend on portfolio company EBITDA growth (GDP-linked), exit multiples (sentiment-driven), and M&A activity. Recessions compress valuations, reduce exit opportunities, and impair carry generation. However, counter-cyclically, downturns create distressed credit opportunities and lower entry multiples for new PE investments. Infrastructure and real assets provide some defensiveness through contracted cash flows.
Rising rates create multiple headwinds: (1) Higher discount rates compress public market multiples, reducing marked-to-market NAV on portfolio holdings; (2) Increased debt service costs for leveraged buyouts reduce portfolio company cash flows and returns; (3) Higher financing costs make large-scale M&A less attractive, reducing exit opportunities; (4) Competition from fixed income yields makes private equity less attractive to LPs on a risk-adjusted basis. However, credit funds benefit from floating-rate loan portfolios that reprice higher. Net impact is moderately negative.
Highly sensitive to credit market conditions. Leveraged buyouts require robust syndicated loan and high-yield bond markets for acquisition financing - credit spread widening above 500bps over Treasuries effectively shuts down large-cap PE activity. KKR's credit platform ($221B AUM) benefits from spread widening through higher yields on new deployments but suffers mark-to-market losses on existing holdings. Tight credit conditions (sub-300bps spreads) enable aggressive buyout activity but compress credit fund returns.
growth - Investors attracted to 15-20% AUM CAGR and operating leverage as management fees compound, with carry providing upside optionality. However, recent -27% 1-year return reflects valuation compression as rates rose and PE exit environment deteriorated. Not a dividend story (modest yield) but rather a compounder dependent on fundraising momentum and realization cycles.
high - Beta typically 1.3-1.5x to S&P 500 given leverage to risk appetite, M&A activity, and public market valuations. Quarterly earnings highly volatile due to lumpy carry recognition. Recent 6-month drawdown of -31% reflects sensitivity to rate volatility and recession fears impacting exit multiples. NAV marking creates additional quarterly volatility as portfolio holdings reprice.
