Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Sempra operates regulated natural gas and electric utilities serving 40 million consumers across California (SDG&E, SoCalGas) and Texas (Oncor), plus LNG export infrastructure including Cameron LNG (3-train facility in Louisiana) and energy infrastructure assets in Mexico. The company is executing a $48B+ capital plan through 2028 focused on grid modernization, renewable interconnections, and LNG expansion, positioning it as a critical enabler of energy transition and natural gas export growth.
Regulated utilities earn authorized returns (9-10% ROE) on rate base through cost-of-service regulation, with revenue decoupled from volumetric sales in California. Rate base growth driven by $8-10B annual capex on grid hardening, wildfire mitigation, renewable interconnections, and system modernization. Sempra Infrastructure generates cash flows from Cameron LNG tolling agreements (20-year take-or-pay contracts with investment-grade counterparties including Mitsui, Mitsubishi, Total) and development fees. Competitive advantage lies in irreplaceable utility franchises, premier LNG export location on Gulf Coast with deepwater access, and regulatory relationships enabling consistent rate base compounding at 6-8% annually.
Rate base growth trajectory and regulatory outcomes in California (CPUC decisions on ROE, wildfire cost recovery, capex authorization)
LNG project FIDs and commercial progress - Port Arthur LNG Phase 1 (13 MTPA), ECA LNG Phase 1 (3.25 MTPA), Cameron expansion trains 4-5
Natural gas demand outlook and Henry Hub-to-international LNG price spreads driving infrastructure utilization
Texas regulatory environment and Oncor rate case outcomes (most recent settled at 9.8% ROE)
Wildfire liability exposure and insurance cost trends in California service territories
Capital allocation decisions between utility rate base investment and LNG development projects
California wildfire liability regime - inverse condemnation doctrine holds utilities strictly liable for fire damages even without negligence, creating uncapped tail risk despite AB 1054 wildfire fund protections
LNG demand destruction risk from accelerated renewable penetration in Asia or European energy policy shifts away from natural gas, potentially stranding $15B+ of LNG development capex
Regulatory disallowances on capex recovery - CPUC has history of scrutinizing utility spending, risk of earning below authorized ROE if investments deemed imprudent
LNG export competition from Qatar North Field expansion (32 MTPA), US Gulf Coast competitors (Venture Global Plaquemines, Golden Pass), and floating LNG projects offering faster time-to-market
Distributed generation and battery storage reducing utility throughput in California, pressuring rate base growth despite decoupling protections
Political pressure for utility municipalization in California following wildfire events and rate increases
Elevated capex requirements ($8-10B annually) create ongoing external financing needs, exposing company to capital markets volatility and rising cost of capital
Pension and OPEB obligations at legacy utilities, though relatively well-funded compared to peers
Contingent wildfire liabilities in California despite AB 1054 protections - potential for multi-billion dollar claims exceeding insurance and wildfire fund coverage
low - Regulated utility earnings are largely insulated from economic cycles due to essential service nature and decoupling mechanisms. Texas electric demand shows modest correlation to industrial activity and population growth. LNG infrastructure earnings are contracted under take-or-pay structures, though development project economics depend on long-term global gas demand and Asian LNG import growth driven by coal-to-gas switching and energy security concerns.
High sensitivity through multiple channels: (1) Utility valuation multiples compress when 10-year Treasury yields rise as dividend yields become less attractive relative to risk-free rates, (2) Financing costs for $8-10B annual capex program increase with rising rates, though partially offset through regulatory lag as allowed ROE incorporates forward rate expectations, (3) AFUDC (Allowance for Funds Used During Construction) on LNG projects increases with higher rates, improving project returns. Debt/equity ratio of 1.08x means ~$30B debt outstanding is sensitive to refinancing costs.
Minimal direct credit exposure. Utility customers are diversified residential/commercial base with minimal collection risk. Cameron LNG counterparties are investment-grade energy majors (Mitsui, Mitsubishi, Total). Primary credit consideration is Sempra's own investment-grade rating (BBB+/Baa1) which affects financing costs for massive capex program and ability to execute LNG development projects requiring project finance structures.
dividend - Sempra offers 3%+ dividend yield with growth tied to 6-8% rate base CAGR, attracting income-focused investors seeking regulated utility stability plus LNG infrastructure growth optionality. The stock appeals to ESG investors given renewable interconnection capex and natural gas as coal displacement fuel, while also drawing infrastructure investors focused on long-duration contracted cash flows from Cameron LNG.
low - Beta typically 0.6-0.8 given 80%+ regulated earnings base. Volatility spikes occur around California wildfire events, CPUC rate case decisions, and LNG project commercial announcements. Daily moves generally <2% except during broader utility sector selloffs driven by interest rate moves.
