Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Verisk Analytics is a data analytics and risk assessment provider serving insurance, energy, and financial services markets. The company operates proprietary databases covering 95% of U.S. property/casualty insurance policies and provides underwriting, claims, and fraud detection solutions with high switching costs due to embedded workflows. Its competitive moat stems from decades of accumulated loss data, regulatory compliance datasets, and mission-critical SaaS platforms that insurers cannot easily replace.
Verisk monetizes proprietary datasets through subscription-based SaaS platforms with 90%+ renewal rates. Insurance clients pay per-policy fees for underwriting data and claims analytics, creating recurring revenue tied to insurance premium volumes. The company aggregates loss data from insurers, anonymizes it, and resells insights back to the industry—a network effect that strengthens as more carriers contribute data. Pricing power derives from regulatory requirements (insurers must use actuarially sound data) and high switching costs (18-24 month implementation cycles). Gross margins exceed 68% due to software economics and minimal incremental cost per additional subscription.
Insurance underwriting cycle dynamics: hard markets (rising premiums) increase policy counts and pricing for Verisk's per-policy fees
Organic revenue growth rates in Insurance Solutions segment, particularly new product adoption (catastrophe modeling, telematics)
M&A activity: divestitures of non-core assets (2022-2023 portfolio rationalization) vs. tuck-in acquisitions in core insurance analytics
Margin expansion trajectory as company transitions from conglomerate to pure-play insurance analytics (target 45%+ operating margins)
Competitive threats from insurtechs building proprietary datasets or AI-driven underwriting models bypassing traditional data vendors
AI disruption: Large insurers (State Farm, Allstate) building proprietary machine learning models using internal data, reducing reliance on third-party vendors like Verisk
Regulatory changes: State insurance departments mandating data transparency or limiting use of certain underwriting variables (credit scores, telematics) could commoditize Verisk's datasets
Insuretech vertical integration: Lemonade, Root, and other digital-native carriers bypassing traditional data vendors by collecting real-time behavioral data
LexisNexis Risk Solutions (RELX) expanding insurance analytics through acquisitions and AI investments, competing directly in claims and fraud detection
CoreLogic and other property data providers encroaching on catastrophe modeling and underwriting analytics
Open-source catastrophe models and academic datasets reducing barriers to entry for niche competitors
Elevated leverage: 13x debt/equity ratio and 3.5x net debt/EBITDA following divestitures and buybacks. Rising rates increase interest expense on floating-rate debt tranches
Pension obligations and deferred tax liabilities contribute to negative book value, though cash generation remains strong
moderate - Insurance premium volumes correlate with GDP growth (commercial lines tied to business activity, personal lines to housing/auto sales). However, subscription model provides revenue stability even in downturns. Hard insurance markets (post-catastrophe events) can boost Verisk's pricing power regardless of GDP. Energy segment (now divested) was more cyclical.
Rising rates have mixed impact: (1) Negative for valuation—high-multiple software stocks compress as discount rates rise, explaining 38% drawdown despite strong fundamentals. (2) Positive for insurance clients' investment income, improving carrier profitability and willingness to invest in analytics. (3) Negative for financing costs given 13x debt/equity ratio, though most debt is fixed-rate. Net effect: valuation compression dominates near-term stock performance.
minimal - Subscription revenue model with annual/multi-year contracts reduces credit risk. Insurance clients (primarily A-rated carriers) have strong balance sheets. Days sales outstanding typically under 60 days. However, small/mid-sized insurers facing solvency issues in hard markets could pressure collections.
growth-at-reasonable-price (GARP) - Historically attracted quality growth investors seeking 7-10% organic revenue growth, 40%+ margins, and 80%+ FCF conversion. Recent 38% drawdown has shifted investor base toward value/contrarian funds betting on multiple re-rating as rate fears subside. Dividend yield under 1% limits income investor appeal.
moderate - Beta approximately 1.0-1.1. Software-like margins provide earnings stability, but high valuation (16.9x EV/EBITDA) amplifies sensitivity to rate changes and growth expectations. Stock historically trades in 15-25x EBITDA range depending on rate environment.
