Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
TeraWulf operates Bitcoin mining facilities with approximately 8 EH/s of operational capacity across two sites: Lake Mariner (New York, 50MW nuclear-powered) and Nautilus Cryptomine (Pennsylvania, 300MW zero-carbon hydro/nuclear). The company differentiates through low-cost, carbon-free power infrastructure targeting institutional-grade mining operations with sub-$25,000/BTC all-in production costs.
TeraWulf generates revenue by deploying ASIC miners to solve cryptographic puzzles, earning newly minted Bitcoin plus transaction fees. Competitive advantage stems from power purchase agreements securing electricity at $20-30/MWh versus industry averages of $40-60/MWh, enabling profitability at lower Bitcoin prices. The zero-carbon power profile attracts ESG-focused institutional capital and positions the company for potential regulatory advantages. Operating leverage is extreme: once infrastructure is built, incremental hashrate deployment has minimal marginal cost, but fixed power commitments and debt service create downside rigidity.
Bitcoin spot price (primary driver: 80%+ correlation, with $10,000 BTC move impacting annual revenue by ~$80-100M at current hashrate)
Network hashrate growth and mining difficulty adjustments (affects BTC production per EH/s deployed)
Hashrate expansion announcements and energization timelines (market prices in 12-18 month forward capacity)
Power cost structure and capacity utilization rates (operational efficiency directly impacts breakeven levels)
Bitcoin halving cycle positioning (next halving April 2024 reduced block rewards, affecting unit economics)
Bitcoin regulatory uncertainty including potential mining restrictions, energy consumption regulations, or unfavorable tax treatment of digital assets
Technological obsolescence of ASIC hardware (2-3 year useful life) requiring continuous $100M+ annual capex to maintain competitive hashrate efficiency
Energy market disruption or loss of favorable power purchase agreements, particularly if nuclear/hydro baseload economics deteriorate or contracts are not renewed beyond 2030-2035 terms
Bitcoin protocol changes or competing blockchain adoption reducing Bitcoin's dominance and mining reward value
Large-scale competitors (Marathon Digital, Riot Platforms, CleanSpark) with superior balance sheets and lower cost of capital can outbid for power contracts and deploy hashrate faster
Publicly-traded miners face pressure to hold Bitcoin on balance sheet during bull markets, creating financing constraints versus private competitors who can sell production immediately
Hyperscale cloud providers (AWS, Google Cloud) entering high-performance computing could commoditize infrastructure services revenue opportunity
Negative operating cash flow of -$30M TTM with $300M capex creates $330M annual cash burn requiring external financing or asset sales
Current ratio of 1.03x provides minimal liquidity buffer if Bitcoin price crashes or credit markets freeze
Debt/Equity of 4.39x with negative equity ROE of -269.7% indicates overleveraged capital structure vulnerable to covenant breaches if EBITDA deteriorates
Going concern risk if Bitcoin sustains below $30,000 for extended period, as all-in breakeven approaches $25,000 with limited margin of safety
moderate - Bitcoin price exhibits partial correlation with risk asset cycles and liquidity conditions, but also trades on crypto-specific narratives (regulatory developments, institutional adoption, halving cycles). Economic downturns typically compress speculative asset valuations, but Bitcoin's non-cyclical use cases (store of value, inflation hedge narrative) provide partial insulation. Mining economics are less GDP-sensitive than Bitcoin price itself, as production costs remain stable regardless of macro conditions.
High sensitivity through multiple channels: (1) Bitcoin valuation compression as rates rise reduces present value of future mining rewards, (2) Capital-intensive expansion plans face higher financing costs with Debt/Equity of 4.39x, (3) Competitive cost of capital for growth capex ($300M TTM) becomes prohibitive in high-rate environments, (4) Risk-off sentiment during rate hiking cycles pressures speculative growth equities. Current negative FCF of -$300M makes refinancing risk material if rates remain elevated.
High exposure - Company requires ongoing access to capital markets or asset-backed financing to fund infrastructure buildout. With negative operating cash flow and 4.39x Debt/Equity, credit market tightening could force dilutive equity raises or slow expansion. Equipment financing for ASIC miners and construction loans for facility development are critical to growth strategy. Tightening credit conditions would disproportionately impact TeraWulf versus cash-generative competitors.
momentum/growth - Stock exhibits extreme beta to Bitcoin price with 248.8% one-year return driven by crypto bull market. Attracts speculative traders seeking leveraged Bitcoin exposure, crypto-focused hedge funds, and thematic growth investors betting on digital asset infrastructure buildout. Negative profitability and cash flow eliminate value and income investors. High volatility (implied by 48.7% quarterly return) appeals to options traders and tactical allocators.
high - Estimated beta to Bitcoin of 2.0-3.0x given operational leverage and balance sheet risk. Stock experiences 5-10% daily moves during Bitcoin volatility events. 83.2% six-month return demonstrates momentum-driven trading with minimal fundamental anchor. Illiquidity in $6.9B market cap with negative cash flow amplifies volatility during redemption cycles.