CPG.LCPG.L
LOADING
|||
Dominic Blakemore: Good morning, and welcome to our full year results. 2025 was another great year for Compass. We delivered strong organic growth and margin progress with profit up nearly 12%. Cash conversion was also very good as we generated $2 billion of free cash flow for the first time. Net new business, the cornerstone of our growth was 4.5%, underpinned by strong new business wins and client retention of over 96%. This was the fourth consecutive year we've delivered net new growth within our 4% to 5% target range. This performance, together with a significant market opportunity, reinforces confidence in the sustainability of our growth algorithm and our ability to deliver long-term compounding shareholder returns. I'll talk more about this later. But before I do, first over to Petros to give you more details on the financials.
Petros Parras: Thanks, Dominic. Good morning, everyone. We've made good progress across all our key metrics as we delivered profit growth ahead of revenue growth. Importantly, free cash flow was also strong, growing faster than profit. Let's start by looking at revenue growth. Net new business continues to be in the middle of our 4% to 5% target range with pricing and volume growth consistent with the first half of the year. With our disposal program now complete, acquisitions are contributing to growth. Operating profit increased nearly 12% to over $3.3 billion. Interest was $315 million, reflecting higher debt due to acquisitions. For fiscal year '26, we expect an interest charge of around $350 million, reflecting the purchase of Vermaat, subject to regulatory approval. As anticipated, our effective tax rate was 25.5%, and this is expected to be the rate in 2026. Importantly, earnings per share were up by just over 11% in constant currency. And turning to cash, CapEx was 3.3% of revenue. Consistent with our guidance, we expect CapEx to be around 3.5% of revenue this year. Working capital improved in the second half, in line with our normal seasonal profile and was broadly neutral for the year. We expect a similar profile in 2026. As a result of our strong cash management, free cash flow conversion improved to 88%. Turning to the regions. In North America, organic revenue increased by over 9%. Operating profit was up nearly 11%, reflecting margin progress. In International, organic revenue growth was nearly 8%. Operating margin was up 20 basis points to 6.1% as the region benefited from overhead leverage, resulting in strong profit growth of nearly 13%. Group organic revenue growth was nearly 9%, with the fourth quarter particularly strong as we benefited from increased catering and hospitality events across certain sectors. Excluding these one-off factors, our underlying Q4 growth was around 8%. We expect this to moderate further in 2026, reflecting a lower inflation. Group margin increased to 7.3% in the second half of 2025 with our unit margin now fully recovered. Looking forward, we are confident of further margin progress whilst balancing growth and investment. We see opportunities to improve margin in both regions and to leverage group overhead. We expect to continue to make incremental gains in North America as we continue to improve productivity across our MAP framework and better utilizing tech and data. In International, as you are aware, we've invested in sales and retention to drive higher net new business growth. We expect faster margin progress in this region as we leverage these investments and benefit from M&A synergies. Dominic will talk about this later. Turning to the balance sheet. Net debt-to-EBITDA was 1.4x. As you are aware, last year, we acquired high-quality businesses, including Dupont and 4Service to capitalize on attractive growth opportunities through further subsectorization. This year, we expect to complete Vermaat along with other bolt-on deals. As a result, leverage is likely to be above our target range in 2026, peaking at the half year. However, our capital allocation model remains unchanged, and we expect to deleverage in 2027 as the business grows and we deliver the M&A synergies. With our disposal program now complete, M&A is contributing to profit. Including Vermaat, we expect acquisitions to add around 2% to profit growth in 2026. Now turning to fiscal year '26 guidance. We expect operating profit growth of around 10% on a constant currency basis, driven by organic revenue growth around 7%, around 2% profit growth from M&A and ongoing margin improvement. Now back to Dominic.
Dominic Blakemore: Thanks, Petros. As you've seen, the business continues to perform well and is in great shape. We're often asked, what's the secret to our success and continued market outperformance. There are 2 key factors. First, we have a unique sectorized business model, which is decentralized with many of our brands still led by the original founder owner entrepreneurs. This model, which was strengthened through M&A over many decades, is incredibly difficult to replicate. And second, we combine the advantages of this localized approach with the benefits of scale, particularly in food procurement and technology. In short, we combine the best of both worlds. We operate in a hugely attractive market with a significant runway for growth, which is continuing to expand. We're investing organically and in M&A to provide us with additional capabilities to accelerate sub-sectorization. For food services alone, our addressable market is worth around $360 billion, of which we have less than 15% market share. And in addition, we see further growth opportunities in targeted high-value support services, where we estimate the market could be worth at least $800 billion. It's worth remembering we're already one of the world's leading support services businesses, generating more than $6 billion of revenue. The business and industry segment of the food services market is worth around $130 billion on its own. You may think as the most outsourced sector, it would have one of the lowest growth rates. In fact, the opposite is true. This year, B&I is our best-performing sector with organic revenue up 11% and the highest net new business growth. We continue to invest in this hugely innovative and dynamic sector, increasing our addressable market by entering new subsectors or through flexible offers such as vending. Our experience in B&I bodes really well for the rest of the group. Our volumes are benefiting from increased participation in our restaurants as we deliver an even more attractive food proposition. The advantages of our business model mean we can provide a high-quality offer at a superior value compared to the high street. As a reminder, we typically don't pay many of the expenses that retailers do as we operate on client premises. We also leverage our procurement scale and have more menu flexibility, allowing us to change ingredients more easily to help mitigate inflation. Our clients also recognize the importance of food and often subsidize our offer. They are hosting more events on site and increasingly use food as a cultural glue and a key enabler for networking and team collaboration. Acquisitions enhance our capabilities and accelerate subsectorization. Targets are usually sourced locally and have been known to us for several years. We look for exceptional businesses with entrepreneurial teams and attractive returns. And the businesses we acquire benefit from continued autonomy under our decentralized model. We provide them with access to Foodbuy as well as global best practice sharing. Having completed many acquisitions over the years, we've established a proven track record of successful M&A. In vending and micro markets, we've been operating a rollout strategy of many small bolt-on deals in North America. Together with strong organic growth, Canteen has now grown revenues to over $4 billion. These acquisitions are hugely value accretive to Compass with returns typically above our cost of capital from year 1. We're also investing in GPOs and recently acquired Regency Purchasing in the U.K. As well as scale, we've benefited from their technology and systems, helping build out sectorization. Regency volumes have doubled since we bought the business with double-digit ROCE in year 2. And most recently, we acquired 4Service in the Nordics, accelerating access to the multi-tenant building subsector in particular. Integration is ahead of schedule, delivering high single-digit growth with financials ahead of our investment case. We've also recently agreed to acquire Vermaat, subject to regulatory approval, a truly exceptional premium food services provider with a market-leading presence in the Netherlands. Vermaat will further improve our ability to deliver tailored on-site concepts and innovative retail solutions as well as providing us with outstanding talent. Once approved, we expect Vermaat to be margin and EPS accretive to Compass in our first full year of ownership. As Petros said earlier, over recent years, we've invested in technology and data to support our sales processes, procurement functions and to drive operational efficiencies. We think of it as benefiting both growth and margin as well as automating some daily tasks for our colleagues. For example, we're optimizing every stage of the sales funnel by using improved processes and data. We now have more visibility of future gross new wins by more accurately tracking the size of the pipeline, our probability and win rates. We've increased the use of automation tools for bid writing to improve their quality and to reduce preparation time. Tech and data are also transforming the client and consumer experience. We have a strong competitive advantage in this space, having invested in digital for many years with around 1,600 people now working in this area alone. With hubs in the U.S., U.K., France and India, we share innovations and best practice across our businesses, leveraging our breadth and our scale. We're using AI to improve our customer proposition using proprietary analytical tools to optimize our product mix and pricing. This helps us to better match our offer to changing customer demand as well as benchmarking pricing in our sites with the local high street. And finally, when it comes to our frontline colleagues, we're increasingly using AI to automate day-to-day tasks such as recruitment. In the U.S., we streamlined our hiring process and reduced the number of recruiters. In Japan, we've implemented an AI chatbot for our frontline colleagues, which answers any queries they may have in seconds, delivering impressive productivity gains. In summary, 2025 has been another strong year for Compass as we continue to deliver on our growth algorithm. We expect to sustain this performance in the long term, delivering high single-digit profit growth with the building blocks being mid- to high single-digit organic revenue growth, ongoing margin progress and contributions from bolt-on M&A now that our disposal program is complete. For 2026, profit growth is expected to be even higher at around 10% as we benefit from the Vermaat acquisition. Now over to Q&A. The operator will share instructions on how to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Operator, over to you.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jamie Rollo from Morgan Stanley.
Jamie Rollo: Three questions, please. First of all, could you talk a bit about what drove that very strong fourth quarter for organic sales, about 9%. I think you said 1% was from sort of one-offs. Maybe talk a bit about what those were. I think we saw a similar thing a year ago and even the year before that, the sort of one-off benefits to keep happening. But also the 7% guidance looks quite conservative even in the context of an underlying sort of plus 8% exit rate. So how should we think about the sort of cadence of organic sales through the year? Secondly, again, it's a question on the guidance, but on the margin side, so 1% profit growth from underlying margins, about 7 basis points, again, looks a little bit conservative. I think for that alone adds about 5 basis points to the group because it's double-digit margin. So could you talk about the upside to margins? And also, how should we think about that 200 basis points gap between North America and International sort of closing, if at all? And then finally, you've given us sort of lots of the AI benefits to the business and your clients on Slide 24. Could you talk a bit about how you might mitigate against sort of the impact of job losses driven by AI on sort of office meal demand in general, please?
Dominic Blakemore: Jamie, thanks for your questions. Let me hand over to Petros for the first 2 questions on run rate and margin guidance, then I'll pick up on the AI point.
Petros Parras: We feel our Q4 underlying rate is about 8%, as you said. We had particularly strong volumes in B&I, Education and Sports & Leisure that we're pleased with. Some of this, we believe it's a onetime in nature. And practically, we have taken this in our guidance for '26. If you think about what has changed as we move to '26 versus '25, it's to do with inflation. We're seeing inflation slowing down a fraction faster than what we thought last year, end of the last year. Spot rate and inflation about 4% blended. We believe it's going to be close to 3%. And we mitigate part of this for our clients. So when you consider our guidance for next year, it assumes a lower rate of inflation within the 7%. It assumes a 4% to 5% corridor in a fifth consecutive year of delivering our strategy and a net positive contribution for volume. When it goes to margin, I think you give us too much credit of being able to forecast 7 basis points or 10 basis points on a going-forward basis. I think our approach there is profit has to grow faster than revenue, call it the 10 basis points on average. What is interesting is our unit profit margin has exceeded what used to be pre-COVID, which gives us sound financials within the units in operations. We benefited from overhead leverage, and we expect to make consistent margin progression going forward. We do not see a ceiling to it. You will continue to see international business to grow faster with some group overhead leverage and some marginal gains in North America. I'll take a pause, and I'll pass to Dominic.
Dominic Blakemore: Very good. Thank you, Petros. Jamie, when it comes to AI, I think in summary, we see it as a net positive for the business. As you rightly say, we shared some examples today of where we're deploying data and AI within the business, most specifically around our growth processes where we think we can get better outcomes on the pipeline build, the preparation for meetings and the conversion into growth. So we're very, very excited about what we're seeing there. We're also very targeted around purchasing and the value we can derive from our purchasing processes and the efficiencies we can introduce for our frontline teams to enable them to dedicate more of their time to their consumer and their clients. When it comes more specifically to the question you raised around net employment numbers, I mean, first of all, just a reminder, B&I is our fastest-growing sector as a group and also both within North America and international. Over 50% of that growth is coming from first-time outsourcing, which is very exciting. And as you've heard Petros say, we had strong volumes in quarter 4 within B&I. So we think our B&I sector is in rude health right now. When it comes to AI, look, we're seeing new clients emerge, particularly on the West Coast, where we've got a number of smaller start-ups, which we are serving through our commissaries and SME type offer. We're seeing some of those scale into significant clients, and we're excited by that. When we talk to our clients in the technology sector, they're very focused on talent retention and attraction, particularly as they seek to get the right capabilities to be best placed with AI. And I think we have a very important role to play there in them helping address that. And then lastly, we're seeing new subsectors emerge like data centers. So with regard to data centers, there's an opportunity for remote feeding through the construction phase. And then once in operation, there's an opportunity for us to provide on-site services, either in the form of restaurants and cafeterias or micro markets. And of course, there's a whole range of different FM services that we're well placed to provide to them in an environment where those services are very highly valued. So right now, we are seeing it as an opportunity, both in terms of what it's bringing to our business and the opportunity it's providing within our client estate.
Operator: We now take our next question from Kate Xiao from Bank of America.
Kate Xiao: My first question is also on AI. I guess thanks for explaining all of the benefits. I guess, any way you could help us quantify the positive impact on the business, either on the revenue enhancement side or cost savings? Any kind of examples or quantification you could give there would be really helpful. And then my second question is on your secured new business, $3.8 billion. That's up 11% year-on-year, which is very, very encouraging. I guess, could you elaborate a little bit on this number? I think the definition is the new business wins over the past 12 months. So would some of the business already be in the FY '25 revenue number already? Or is it mostly the pipeline for FY '26 growth?
Dominic Blakemore: Thank you, Kate, and welcome. I think this is your first call with us. When it comes to quantifying AI, look, we don't think we're in a place to do that right now. I think like many things we see, we see puts and takes that drive volumes and new business opportunity. At the moment, on the sort of volumes and new business side, as you heard me say, we think it's a net positive. And then with regard to the savings that we're generating within the business, I think what we're seeing most of all is an opportunity for greater effectiveness and the ability to redeploy our people's time on more value-creating opportunities. We're certainly seeing that within sales. And what would I say, maybe we're generating 15% to 20% time efficiency, which can be redirected into more value-creating preparation for meetings and bid preparation, for example. So that's really how we're thinking about it. It's how do we redeploy effort and time into the bigger opportunities. And then specifically on the new business ARO, yes, $3.8 billion. We're super pleased. We need to continue to grow that relentlessly year in, year out. Our pipelines look very attractive. More importantly, almost than the gross new business wins, our pipelines are growing at the rate we need to see them grow. You've seen us speak today to the increase in the market that has come by way of some of the acquisitions we've made, which opens the total addressable market up for us. So we've now got a market which is over $360 billion. That's what's really exciting. The more we can target sectors and subsectors of opportunity where our operating model is best placed to win, then the more sustainable we believe the growth is. As you heard Petros say, we're super excited that this is 4 years now reported within 4% to 5%. We're well placed to see another year of growth within the 4% to 5%. And our objective is to continue to build our TAM and our processes deploying AI such that we can sustain those growth rates and those retention rates over the long term and deliver within the growth algorithm that we've shared with you. As you rightly say, some of that business will have deployed in financial '25 and will be rolling into '26 on an annualized basis. Some of it will be yet to deploy in '26. And the odd contract would have been one which will deploy in future years as we've also witnessed in the past where we've got some business that comes online. So the correlation between new business won and the in the year benefit within that 4% to 5% range is rolling. But we're really pleased that we've delivered that 11% increase year-on-year, which gives us every confidence that we can sustain the 4% to 5% as the business scales and the absolute numbers get bigger.
Operator: And our next question comes from Simon LeChipre from Jefferies.
Simon LeChipre: Three as well, if I may. First of all, on the $3.8 billion new business wins, I'm not sure you mentioned the mix of FTO within this number. I think it was 48% by Q3. So keen to get an update on this. Secondly, on net new, just wondering if net new was also within the 4% to 5% range for the international region. And lastly, I mean, in the U.S., you mentioned some opportunities in data centers. But more broadly, do you believe you could benefit from different investment plan going on like the Infrastructure investments, CHIPS Act and so on. Just wondering if it's something relevant for you.
Dominic Blakemore: Thank you, Simon. Yes, let me pick up on your third question, and then I'll hand the first 2 to Petros. Absolutely, we're super excited by investment in new -- all new forms of technology, and we see those as opportunities for us. So I obviously referenced data centers, but yes, semiconductor manufacturer where it's been onshore in particular, is presenting opportunities for us. We're seeing data centers all around the world as an area of opportunity for us. And particularly where we see the build of new energy technology, those present opportunities for us. So there are -- as we've always witnessed, there are new sectors and subsectors of business and industry that emerge at pace and scale. And we believe that we've got a range of offers that can play into those, which means we've always got what the client is looking for. What's really important is that we're spotting these trends. We're moving quickly, and we are building an offer that is compelling for the client in their needs. Petros?
Petros Parras: On the $3.8 billion Dom referenced, it's growing 11%. FTO around 45%, which is very pleasing to see. If you go back to pre-COVID, it was about 1/3 of our source of new business wins, continues to be elevated, which plays back to the complexities of the clients and our ability to serve and solve some of the challenges. I would say it's broad-based and represents a fair share of our sectors. And as Dom referenced, particularly with B&I continue to have great momentum within this $3.8 billion. When it goes to net new international, let's take a step back here. And if you look at from 2019 all the way back, international was nearly flat. We have 4 years of consistent good growth. We have 4 years of elevated net new for this part of the business. And the most pleasing thing for us is retention. You look at retention, we used to be in the low 90s. We are mid-90s sustainably. We would like to do better as we move forward in international business. We have opportunities. If you look in North American business, retention, some of our international business, the more sectorized we become, the more GPOs we deploy the Compass full toolkit, we should be in a position to drive marginal gains in international business. But we recognized consistent and good growth, and we're working towards sustaining this good growth in international part of the business.
Dominic Blakemore: Yes. I mean I would probably just add to that. If there's anything that pleases me most about the business, it's the performance of the international region. We've seen an acceleration in our net new and improvement in our retention. As Jamie pointed out earlier, there's still a couple of points difference between the margins of North America and International. We see an opportunity to close that gap over time. We think the North America margin will continue to nudge forward. We see an opportunity for the international margin to grow faster as we make margin-accretive acquisitions, as we move toward GPOs in each of the individual international geographies, we see a good opportunity on margin there. There's still a delta in retention between North America and international. We think we can close that gap too as we deploy our processes, and we're seeing consistent improvement. What's most important, though, is the sustainability and consistency of that. And we're starting to build a bit of a track record, as Petros said, over the last few years, and we need to sustain that going forward, and we're confident we can. Having said all of that, I'd also just like to remind us that the North America performance was extremely strong last year, and we're incredibly proud of that. We think that we have every reason to believe that, that's sustainable, too.
Operator: And our next question will come from Jaafar Mestari from BNP Paribas.
Jaafar Mestari: I have 3 questions, if that's okay. Firstly, because you've provided this all-in guidance, which includes M&A and Vermaat, just a couple of questions on this. One, what timing of the Vermaat consolidation have you assumed in the guidance? And two, how should we look at the $350 million net finance cost guidance in this context? Is it $300 million run rate until the Vermaat consolidation and then it's $350 million as you pay for it? Or does the financing that you have in place mean that it's $350 million regardless of the exact timing of the deal closing? And then more fundamentally, one of your competitors has announced they would be investing in sales force -- in their sales headcount in at least one large U.S. vertical because they signed so little. Another one of your competitors paid their sales team $25 million extra bonus because they signed so much this year. How do you keep and motivate your hunters? You've talked about the founders involvement. Could you give us some more color on the sales teams themselves who bring in $3.8 billion? How many are they? What sort of background? What sort of support do they have, how they run and how they paid?
Dominic Blakemore: I'll speak to the question on our sales resource, and then I'll hand over to Petros for the first 2 questions around Vermaat. Look, I think the first thing to say is the consistency of our track record. You've seen us deliver the new business growth now globally across North America and international, as I said, over 4 years. We've got great line of sight of the fifth year. More importantly, we've been doing that in North America for certainly the 13 years I've been with the group and probably over 20 years. So there is a consistency to our process and execution that I think is critical to the strength of our performance. We've got longevity and tenure in many of the people who work with us. Our organization, as we talk about often, is designed around sectors and subsectors. So we have dedicated sellers for each of the offers that we provide to our clients. We have dedicated sellers who are focused on the first-time outsourcing opportunity. Often that's a longer sell. And so we are incentivizing them over multiyear rather than individual year's performances. I won't speak to the independent -- the individual reward structures, but we have processes that have worked for us repeatedly. Our pipeline looks out 1 and 3 years, and we're excited by that. When you speak about the different competitive pressures, again, having been around this business for a while now, I've seen the competitive pressures ebb and flow. I see no real difference today to that which we've experienced previously. I think it's really important that we keep doing what we're doing. And that starts with expanding the TAM so that we've got ever more opportunity, being relentlessly focused on what the pipelines look like 1, 2, 3 years out, being relentlessly focused on our retention and how we secure and preempt to minimize the retention risk. We've seen a consistent improvement in retention. We put that down to our SAG processes, our non-SAG processes, which we're getting more dedicated to all of the time. And actually, the use of data around consumer NPS and our client feedback on an anonymized basis is allowing us to make even better decisions around that. So we just remain relentlessly focused on doing what we're doing on sharing our best practices and scaling our teams. We're always adding sellers into the business to ensure we can continue to grow at scale. But what I come back to is how important it is to continue to expand the TAM to give us the marketplace to grow into. And again, elevating the conversation, we have a 15% global market share in an industry that's still 50% self-op. There's huge runway for all of us to grow into.
Petros Parras: On Vermaat, just to remind everyone, it's still subject to regulatory clearance. We have taken an assumption on contribution as of the first quarter of '26. We have line of sight we are in the final stint of this being closed, and we remain very excited to welcome the Vermaat team within the Compass Group family. When it goes to the interest expense for next year, about $350 million. This assumes Vermaat including the numbers and a bit of [ in-field ] M&A that we'll continue to invest in the business as we move forward.
Jaafar Mestari: So just to be clear, it's going to be $350 million regardless of that timing?
Petros Parras: Yes.
Jaafar Mestari: Can I have a short follow-up on this, please? What's your assessment of the EPS accretion of the deal? You said positive for this year because you're presumably closing it late in the year, but you immediately have that higher finance costs. It doesn't look like we can justify even a decimal upside to consensus EPS. But if we annualize this on the full year, what sort of accretion do you think this deal if everything happened at the same time, interest costs and consolidation, please?
Petros Parras: I think in Dominic's script, I think we say it's going to be accretive on EPS and a full year of ownership. You have to appreciate depending on when this deal is going to close, there is a different contribution of profit vis-a-vis the interest cost, will be accretive to growth as it closes. And importantly, with the synergy cases as we go in delivering good growth and some synergies on the cost lines, we should be able to drive further EPS accretion on a year 2 and year 3 basis.
Operator: Our next question will come from Leo Carrington from Citigroup.
Leo Carrington: If I could ask 3 as well, please. Firstly, on the North America H2 margins, which were flat despite the organic growth. Is there anything to call out as weighing on the margins this year, possibly the $440 million of M&A spend -- anything there would be useful. Secondly, I do appreciate the focus of yours is on B&I today. But in health care, your U.S. peer on a big multisite contract. Is this part of an acceleration in outsourcing in North America healthcare segment that you can also see or something of a one-off? And then lastly, I was interested in the Slide 29 showing the guidance evolution pre post pandemic. What exactly do you attribute the improvement, the increase in like-for-like volume growth to that you expect to see?
Dominic Blakemore: Okay. Thank you, Leo. Why don't I take your second and third question and then Petros can speak to North American margins. Look, first of all, yes, I mean, the health care sector remains incredibly exciting for us. It's one of the sectors with the most significant first-time outsourcing opportunity, both in North America and international. We are seeing contracts come out on a multisite, multiservice basis, which are first-time outsourcing opportunities. So whether we would call that an acceleration or it's the normal trend, I think we'll determine as we go. But there are some very exciting opportunities in the sector, and that's been the case both in North America and international. And I could say the same for higher ed as well. So look, our sectors remain vibrant. We see lots of opportunities, not just in B&I, but across all of the sectors and really informs our sort of confidence today in sustaining our net new growth algorithm and the ever-expanding TAM. And then when it comes to like-for-like volume growth, look, I think there's quite a few puts and takes that we could pull apart, whether it's sort of return to office over time and so forth. But I think the biggest single trend to me is the one that we sort of called out in the slides today. And that is, I think, the greater appreciation of the value that we offer relative to the high street. I'm very confident that the quality of what we offer is on a par. I think we've got some exceptional consumer offers now within our estate, but we're providing that to our consumers at a very, very significant discount to the high street. And through this period of elevated pricing, that delta has become ever more. We talked about why that is. Obviously, it's the fact that we typically aren't paying utilities on site. But I think our scale of purchasing is just so much greater than the high street competitor set. That provides advantage and our menu flexibility is so much greater. And I think therein lies a huge opportunity to create value for our consumer. That combined with the opportunity or the case where many of our clients are partially or fully subsidizing the offer. I think that's meant that we are capturing more people on our estate and they're having more daypart occasions with us. And I really do believe that, that is what is behind our successful volume growth. And I think you can see that in a number of our sectors. And then when you think more about where you've got the type of consumer that would be within the sort of Sports & Leisure, the event sector, I think we've got even better at retailing, understanding per capita spend, consumer trends. We've got data analytics businesses that are helping us drive an understanding of those. And we're working very closely with our clients because the clients see it such an important part of their hospitality performance to be able to drive that. And hence, we benefit from that, too. I think you see that in the Q4 volumes, where we have a positive calendar of events, we're also performing positively on volumes.
Petros Parras: On North America, we're really pleased on what the business has achieved. If you really step back and you look at North America operating margin is fully recovered to pre-COVID. Within '25, there was noticeable margin progress as this business grows. I want to remind you, business is 65% bigger to pre-COVID and enjoying this elevated growth and still delivering margin progress is quite remarkable for our teams, I think. On a going-forward basis, we will expect still to do some marginal gains as we grow, more of an overhead leverage. And we remain positive on the trajectory of this business. If you're referring to the half 2 versus half 1, we made progress versus both halves of last year. And as we came to a fully normalized world on recovering the margin, there is some seasonality in there. North America has always been stronger margin in the first half to second half.
Dominic Blakemore: Yes. I would add on margins as a group, I probably feel as confident as I've ever been that we will see steady, consistent incremental margin progress in North America and International. Why is that? Just remind ourselves of the portfolio work we did where we exited a number of the more volatile markets. I think we've got much more consistent business now. We've got a much more sustainable foundation and base, and I think we can grow from that consistently from here. So that's what's informing our confidence both in North America and International that we should see consistent, steady margin progression.
Operator: Our next question will come from Estelle Weingrod from JPMorgan.
Estelle Weingrod: I've got a first question on North America. You talked about the very good performance of B&I. Can you give us an update on other segments, in particular, higher education? Any indication on the full terms enrollment numbers? And the second question on Europe. Can you provide a bit more granularity on the underlying momentum? You mentioned B&I and Sports & Leisure. Can you be more specific perhaps on a country basis or at least any country you call out underpinning this solid momentum? And have you noticed or have you witnessed any signs of a softer macro in some countries in Europe, like in France impacting volumes?
Dominic Blakemore: Petros, do you want to take the North American higher-ed question, and I'll speak to Europe.
Petros Parras: So North America, as Dominic referenced, very strong B&I, low double-digit growth, broad-based across all subsectors. If you look in the rest of the sectors, we're in the high single-digit growth territory, which is quite pleasing. It's what we call broad-based growth. And actually, if you look at our sector footprint, we expect to be this way as we are fully sectorized and we're winning good businesses within every sector. When it comes to education, I think enrollments came in good, in line with our expectations, continues to have some good momentum in the education business as we move to the fiscal year '26 year.
Dominic Blakemore: And with regard to Europe, yes, I mean, actually, Estelle, you spoke to it. We are 2/3 of B&I business in Europe. So for us to grow, we need to be seeing positive growth in B&I, which is the case. We've got a very exciting pipeline. We've won some really nice opportunities in the Nordic region, in France, in Germany, we continue to perform extremely well in Spain and in Turkey. So we've got a strong portfolio of countries that are all growing together. Importantly, and going back to the earlier conversation, what's really stepped up has been our retention performance in Europe. Again, if we compare it to the years that Petros described when we were sort of flatlining for growth, the real difference there is that 3 percentage point improvement in our retention rates, which we believe are sustainable. We've got very rigorous retention processes that we've trained out and we're managing through the region, and that gives us good confidence in momentum. We've got a very exciting pipeline for Europe. And I think the other feature is, for example, we've launched our Levy Sports & Leisure brand into Europe, and we're managing that across all of our international markets now actually. And we're seeing good momentum as we start to win our first accounts. Obviously, we talked about not in Europe, but the Australian Tennis Open, which was won last year. But also we're seeing our first ones in the sports areas in Europe, which is exciting. And then lastly, obviously, the acquisitions we've made 4Service in the Nordics and others are starting to give us access to new subsectors within B&I, which gives us even increased confidence on sustaining those growth rates in Europe. So look, we think that it's an ever-improving performance that we can expect in Europe, and we'll continue to nudge up within our net new growth range of 4% to 5%. On the macro point, sorry, at this point, we aren't seeing any degradation on our volumes from the macro, but we remain watchful. And look, I know there's some concern out there about are we likely to enter any recessionary conditions across the piece. I think a reminder, first of all, we're not seeing it. And then secondly, we do believe that the resiliency of this business can demonstrate itself in those times. First of all, our clients look for value and cost savings. And whenever there's been a tighter macro, we've seen an acceleration in first-time outsourcing and also in rebidding of contracts for more value. And I think we're very, very well placed there. And then secondly, if the consumer is looking for value in tougher times, then I think everything I said about what's driving the volume performance will stand us in incredibly good stead. So look, I think we feel well placed whatever may be ahead of us.
Operator: The next question will come from Ivar Billfalk-Kellyfrom UBS.
Ivar Billfalk-Kelly: You've mentioned FM a couple of times in passing on the calls, where it usually feels like we go several quarters without it being mentioned at all. Can this be an indication that it's a bigger focus going forward? And can you talk about the relative margin contribution of FM services compared to the traditional food service and the outlook for growth? Secondly, you're investing in M&A and GPOs in the U.K. You still don't have much in the way of GPOs in the rest of Europe. What would realistic time lines be for rollout of GPOs in your Continental European operations? And what's actually needed for them to be successful? And thirdly, on the health care in North America, as I understand, a lot of the U.S. health groups already have their own GPOs. And since GPOs are a key element of your offering, what is your relative positioning compared to your peers, given I understand the GPOs in health care actually like you to use them rather than your own procurement. Any comments there would be helpful.
Dominic Blakemore: Thank you for those questions. Actually, really interesting and thoughtful. First of all, FM, yes, look, we're predominantly a food services group, 85% of our business is food. But look, that 15% that we deliver support services across a spectrum of different services in FM is $6 billion. That makes us the fifth or sixth biggest support services company globally. We also operate support services with great capability in many markets. We've quietly got on with that. It's been growth neutral. So it's been growing at par with our food service business and actually is also margin neutral, so on a par with our food services business. So it's a good business for us. Where we sell it alongside our food as a multiservice offer or an integrated offer, it can be very sticky with clients. Typically, we've seen it in the defense sector, the remote sector, the health care sector and increasingly within the education sector. Within B&I, it's often sold separately rather than as an integrated offer. But look, we think it's an attractive market that in a number of countries, we are well placed for. We quantified the market today within our slides $800 billion. It's very fragmented. So there's a long runway for opportunity for growth. We're clearly not prioritizing that over our food service business, but we will consistently execute. And we really just wanted to remind everyone today of the scale of that business and the capabilities that we offer. And that I think if you're very selective in the services you provide and where you work with clients, then it can be an attractive adjacency to food. On the M&A for GPOs, you're absolutely right. We've been building out our U.K. Foodbuy business very successfully over time. We gave some great examples today, particularly Regency. Our U.S. Foodbuy business continues to be incredibly accretive for us and an important part of our portfolio. We have a Foodbuy business in Canada, Australia and the U.K. We already operate GPOs today in some of our European markets. So we operate them in the Scandinavian area within Belgium. We haven't yet built those out in some of the other bigger individual countries. It is an area of focus for us. You asked what is the sort of recipe for success. Actually, when we take a step back, what enabled both the U.S. and the U.K. to build credible and scale Foodbuy offer was first acquiring the capabilities of a GPO and then bringing the Compass volumes into that GPO to get aggregate scale and then to franchise the capabilities and the services alongside the scale into the third-party market so that we can grow disproportionately with our own estate, our acquisitions and the third-party growth. And we think that really is the sort of the recipe for success in other markets, and it's one that you should expect to see us pursue over time. And then finally, with regard to the North American health care GPOs. Yes, we partner with many health care GPOs that operate for themselves across their own health care estate. Remember, they're typically buying pharmaceuticals, equipment, linen and other nonfood categories where they've got significant scale, actually bringing their food volumes into our significant food buying volumes can yield even more value for them. So we think there's a really interesting and exciting way to partner with the North American health care GPOs to give them more value and bring more volume into our model.
Operator: We have time for one final question today. Neil Tyler from Rothschild.
Neil Tyler: Just a couple of quick follow-ups actually to previous questions. Firstly, just touching on the last question around FM support services. In your prepared remarks, I may have misheard, but I think you mentioned that you would consider adding to those services through M&A. I just wanted to make sure I understood that correctly in isolated instances, obviously, but if you could clarify there. And then secondly, Dominic, going back to the point or the focus you put on the expanded addressable market, the additional sort of $40 billion or so. Can you just talk a little bit more about where that's come from? You mentioned it's come through the acquired expertise over the last 12 months or so. And are there opportunities to continue to replicate what's happened over the last 12 months through further M&A?
Dominic Blakemore: Yes. Thank you, Neil. Look, on the first point, I think we'll consider tuck-in bolt-ons wherever appropriate within our portfolio to ensure that we've got the right offer for our clients and that we can continue to either defend our estate or to grow the TAM. And that would apply within bolt-ons within FM and Support Services as necessary. Separately, your question on the TAM, yes, I think it's been a really positive feature and one of the driving reasons for the M&A that we've done over recent years. If you think about 4Service, it's given us access to the multi-tenant market where previously we would seek to win business through our clients, we now partner with the real estate owners as they construct new facilities, which are multi-tenanted and multiservice. It's an exciting segment that we weren't previously as exposed to and didn't necessarily have the capabilities for. It's a trend in the Northern European countries, and it gives us the capabilities that we can build into other European markets. I think that's a great example. We've done a number of micro market acquisitions in the U.K. to build a canteen type micro market offer in the U.K. That comes first with technology and then by building a regional presence such that we can offer our clients national coverage with a technology-enabled solution. That's opened up the micro market and vending subsector in the U.K. to us where we previously didn't have the capability or range of services to deliver that, that's something that we feel we can replicate in other international countries, given the learnings that we've had in the U.S. and Canada, in particular. The HOFMANN acquisition gave us access through a high-quality frozen offer into SMEs where we can deliver in at a lesser scale, a consistently high-quality offer that can be frozen and used over time. That's an exciting part of the market that we previously didn't necessarily access. And with Vermaat, although not yet closed, they have an exciting joint program, which is a sort of technology-enabled delivered in solution, which, again, we can leverage and learn from. So I think all of the M&A, we talk about giving ourselves access to capability, both in terms of the business model and offer, but also the people running the businesses. And I think those are great examples of that and where we'll focus as we go forward.
Operator: With this, I'd like to hand the call back over to Dominic Blakemore for closing remarks. Over to you, sir.
Dominic Blakemore: I mean just quick to say thank you all for joining us today, and we look forward to hosting you with the first quarter results in February next year. In the meantime, wishing those of you a happy Thanksgiving or happy Christmas holidays.
Operator: 6 Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation, ladies and gentlemen. You may now disconnect.