Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
The InterGroup Corporation operates a small portfolio of hotel properties primarily in San Francisco and Missouri, generating revenue through room rentals and ancillary services. The company's negative net margin despite positive operating margin suggests significant non-operating expenses or asset impairments. With a $100M market cap and minimal debt, INTG represents a micro-cap lodging play concentrated in specific urban markets, making it highly sensitive to local occupancy trends and regional economic conditions.
INTG owns and operates hotel real estate, earning revenue from daily room rentals with pricing power tied to local market occupancy rates and average daily rates (ADR). The 26.7% gross margin is typical for hotel operators after accounting for direct operating costs (housekeeping, front desk, utilities). The business model relies on maximizing revenue per available room (RevPAR) through yield management while controlling fixed property costs. Geographic concentration in San Francisco exposes the company to that market's business travel, tourism, and convention demand cycles. Limited debt provides financial flexibility but constrains growth through acquisitions.
San Francisco hotel market occupancy rates and ADR trends, particularly business travel and convention activity recovery
Regional tourism demand in Missouri markets where properties are located
Property-level EBITDA margins and same-store RevPAR growth
Asset sale announcements or portfolio repositioning given the small asset base
Local regulatory changes affecting short-term rental competition or hotel operations
Secular shift toward remote work reducing business travel demand permanently, particularly affecting San Francisco office-dependent hotel demand
Short-term rental platforms (Airbnb, VRBO) providing structural competition for leisure travelers with price advantages
San Francisco-specific challenges including high operating costs, regulatory burden, and urban quality-of-life concerns affecting tourism appeal
Limited scale preventing competitive cost structure versus national hotel chains with centralized reservation systems and loyalty programs
Branded hotel chains (Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt) with superior distribution, loyalty programs, and marketing reach competing for the same guests
New hotel supply in San Francisco and Missouri markets potentially oversupplying rooms and pressuring occupancy rates
Independent hotels lacking brand recognition struggling to attract guests without significant marketing spend or OTA dependence
Negative ROE and net margin indicate underlying profitability challenges or non-operating losses that could pressure liquidity if sustained
Zero current ratio suggests potential working capital constraints or classification issues requiring monitoring
Small market cap and limited float create liquidity risk for investors and potential difficulty raising capital for growth
Concentrated asset base in specific markets creates geographic concentration risk without diversification benefits
high - Hotel demand is highly correlated with GDP growth, business travel spending, and discretionary consumer spending on leisure travel. Business travel typically accounts for 60-70% of urban hotel demand and is among the first expenses cut during economic downturns. The company's San Francisco exposure links performance directly to Bay Area tech sector health and corporate travel budgets. Recessions typically cause 15-25% RevPAR declines for urban hotels.
Moderate sensitivity despite zero reported debt. Rising rates increase the discount rate applied to hotel cash flows, compressing valuation multiples (hotel REITs and owners typically trade at lower EV/EBITDA multiples in high-rate environments). Higher rates also reduce potential buyer universe for asset sales by increasing acquisition financing costs. However, the lack of floating-rate debt eliminates direct interest expense impact. If the company were to pursue acquisitions, higher rates would increase financing costs and reduce accretive deal opportunities.
Minimal direct credit exposure given the asset-light balance sheet with no reported debt. However, the company is indirectly exposed to corporate credit conditions through business travel demand—tighter credit reduces corporate travel budgets and convention activity. Consumer credit conditions affect leisure travel demand, though this is a smaller revenue component for urban business hotels.
value - The 0.9x price/sales ratio and 5.8x EV/EBITDA suggest the stock trades at a discount to intrinsic asset value, attracting value investors seeking mispriced hotel real estate. The 93% one-year return indicates momentum traders have participated, but negative net margin and micro-cap status limit institutional ownership. Investors are likely betting on operational turnaround, asset sale monetization, or San Francisco market recovery. The 6.1% FCF yield appeals to cash flow-focused investors despite negative net income.
high - The -23.6% three-month return following a 120.5% six-month gain demonstrates extreme volatility typical of micro-cap stocks with limited float. Hotel stocks are inherently cyclical with high operating leverage amplifying earnings volatility. Small market cap creates susceptibility to low-volume price swings and limited analyst coverage reduces information flow, increasing uncertainty and volatility.