Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Visual sector performance
Jasper Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing JSP191, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD117 for conditioning in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chronic spontaneous urticaria. The company is pre-revenue with a 2.59x current ratio indicating approximately 2-3 years of cash runway at current burn rates. Stock performance reflects clinical trial execution risk and capital market conditions for early-stage biotech.
Jasper operates a binary clinical development model where value creation depends entirely on successful Phase 2/3 trial readouts and regulatory approvals. The company targets two distinct markets: stem cell transplant conditioning (replacing chemotherapy/radiation) and chronic spontaneous urticaria (mast cell disease). Monetization pathways include partnering/licensing JSP191 to larger pharmaceutical companies for commercialization or building internal commercial capabilities post-approval. Operating cash burn of $100M annually against minimal capex reflects R&D-intensive model with outsourced manufacturing.
JSP191 clinical trial data readouts and patient enrollment milestones in transplant conditioning studies
FDA regulatory interactions including IND clearances, Fast Track designations, and Breakthrough Therapy status
Partnership announcements or licensing deals with major pharmaceutical companies for commercialization rights
Cash runway updates and equity financing announcements given negative $100M operating cash flow
Competitive developments in CD117-targeting therapies or alternative transplant conditioning approaches
Binary clinical trial risk: Phase 2/3 failures in JSP191 programs would eliminate substantially all enterprise value given single-asset focus
Regulatory pathway uncertainty for novel CD117-targeting mechanism in transplant conditioning requiring extensive safety data
Reimbursement risk as payers may resist premium pricing for transplant conditioning versus established chemotherapy/radiation protocols
Magenta Therapeutics and other companies developing alternative CD117-targeting antibodies or small molecules for transplant conditioning
Established transplant conditioning regimens with decades of clinical experience creating high bar for adoption despite toxicity concerns
Large pharmaceutical companies with greater resources potentially entering CD117 space through internal development or acquisitions
Cash runway of approximately 2-3 years based on 2.59x current ratio and $100M annual burn requires near-term equity financing with dilution risk
Negative ROE of -261.9% and ROA of -158.4% reflect accumulated losses typical of clinical-stage development but limit financing options to equity markets
Equity market volatility and biotech sector sentiment directly impact ability to raise capital on favorable terms, with recent 79.8% one-year decline constraining financing flexibility
low - Clinical trial timelines and regulatory processes are largely insulated from GDP fluctuations. However, severe recessions can impact ability to raise capital and pharmaceutical company M&A activity. Patient enrollment may see modest delays during economic stress but core value drivers remain trial execution rather than economic conditions.
Rising interest rates create significant headwinds through two mechanisms: (1) higher discount rates compress NPV of future cash flows from potential drug approvals 5-7 years out, disproportionately impacting pre-revenue biotechs, and (2) reduced risk appetite in capital markets increases cost of equity financing and dilution risk. The 10-year Treasury yield directly impacts biotech valuation multiples as investors compare risk-adjusted returns to risk-free rates.
Minimal direct credit exposure as company has low debt (0.15x Debt/Equity) and operates on equity financing. However, credit market conditions indirectly affect ability to raise capital through equity offerings. Tight credit spreads typically correlate with stronger biotech IPO/follow-on markets, while widening spreads signal risk-off sentiment that makes equity raises more dilutive.
growth - Attracts speculative biotech investors and venture-style public market funds willing to accept binary clinical trial risk for potential multi-bagger returns on successful drug approval. Not suitable for value or income investors given pre-revenue status and negative cash flows. Requires 3-5 year investment horizon aligned with clinical development timelines.
high - Clinical-stage single-asset biotechs exhibit extreme volatility with 50-80% intraday moves common on trial data releases. Recent 79.8% one-year decline and 61.1% six-month decline reflect both sector-wide biotech weakness and company-specific clinical/financing concerns. Beta likely exceeds 2.0x relative to broader market given small-cap biotech classification and binary risk profile.
