Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Visual sector performance
Olo operates a cloud-based SaaS platform connecting restaurant brands to on-demand commerce, enabling digital ordering, delivery marketplace integration, and front-of-house solutions. The company serves over 700 restaurant brands including Wingstop, Five Guys, and Sweetgreen, processing billions in gross merchandise value annually. Competitive position centers on deep integrations with major delivery platforms (DoorDash, Uber Eats, Grubhub) and embedded position within restaurant POS ecosystems.
Olo charges restaurant brands monthly platform fees per location plus variable per-transaction fees (typically $0.10-0.30 per order) for orders processed through its system. Revenue scales with both new brand wins and same-store order volume growth. Pricing power derives from switching costs once integrated into restaurant operations and POS systems, plus network effects from delivery marketplace integrations. The company benefits from secular shift to off-premise dining, which accelerated post-2020 and has sustained elevated levels. Gross margins of 55% reflect typical SaaS economics with low incremental delivery costs.
Net new location additions - expansion within existing brands and new brand wins drive platform ARR growth
Active location count and churn rates - retention metrics signal product stickiness and competitive positioning
Order volume growth rates - same-store order volumes indicate health of off-premise dining trends and market share
Platform ARPU expansion - upsell of additional modules (Dispatch, Rails, Engage) drives revenue per location
Operating margin trajectory - path to sustained profitability and free cash flow generation
Platform disintermediation - large restaurant chains (McDonald's, Starbucks) building proprietary ordering technology in-house, reducing addressable market for third-party solutions
Delivery marketplace consolidation - if DoorDash/Uber Eats develop competing restaurant SaaS offerings or acquire competitors, could threaten Olo's middleware positioning
Regulatory risk around delivery marketplace fees and commission caps could reduce restaurant willingness to invest in digital infrastructure
Toast expanding from POS into ordering/delivery management creates bundled competitive threat, particularly in SMB segment
Point-of-sale vendors (NCR, Oracle) adding native ordering capabilities reduces need for third-party middleware
Vertical SaaS competitors (Lunchbox, Itsacheckmate) targeting specific restaurant segments with specialized features
Minimal financial risk given strong liquidity position and negligible debt
Cash burn risk if growth investments fail to translate to profitability timeline expected by public markets, though current near-breakeven operating margin reduces concern
moderate - Restaurant industry is consumer discretionary with cyclical exposure, but off-premise ordering has become structural behavior. Economic weakness reduces restaurant traffic and order volumes, directly impacting transaction-based revenue (~30% of total). However, subscription revenue (~70%) provides stability, and digital ordering may gain share during downturns as restaurants optimize labor costs. Quick-service restaurant (QSR) exposure provides some defensive characteristics versus full-service dining.
Rising rates create dual pressure: (1) valuation multiple compression typical for unprofitable growth software companies trading on forward revenue multiples, and (2) reduced venture capital funding for restaurant tech competitors and potential customers. However, minimal direct business impact as Olo carries negligible debt (0.02 D/E) and generates positive operating cash flow. Rate cuts would likely expand valuation multiples and improve customer spending environment.
Minimal direct exposure. Strong balance sheet with 7.72x current ratio and negligible debt eliminates refinancing risk. Customer credit risk limited by monthly billing cycles and prepayment structures. Indirect exposure if restaurant bankruptcies accelerate during credit stress, though diversification across 700+ brands mitigates concentration risk.
growth - investors focused on secular digitization of restaurant industry and SaaS revenue model scalability. Recent 115% one-year return and 66% six-month return indicate momentum investor interest. High revenue growth (25% YoY) with path to profitability attracts growth-at-reasonable-price (GARP) investors. Minimal dividend yield and negative historical ROE eliminate value and income investor appeal.
high - small-cap software stock ($1.7B market cap) with elevated beta typical of unprofitable growth companies. Stock sensitive to SaaS multiple compression/expansion driven by interest rate expectations and risk appetite. Limited analyst coverage and institutional ownership concentration can amplify price swings on earnings surprises or guidance changes.