Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Visual sector performance
Skillz operates a mobile gaming platform enabling competitive esports tournaments for casual games, monetizing through platform fees on entry-based competitions. The company has experienced severe contraction with revenue declining 37% YoY to approximately $100M, operating at significant losses despite high gross margins. The stock trades at distressed valuations (0.6x sales, 0.4x book) reflecting investor concerns about user retention, competitive pressures from established gaming platforms, and path to profitability.
Skillz generates revenue by taking a percentage rake (estimated 10-15%) from entry fees in cash-based mobile game competitions. The platform connects game developers seeking monetization with players willing to compete for real money prizes. High gross margins (86%) reflect the asset-light platform model with minimal incremental costs per transaction, but the company faces substantial customer acquisition costs and platform development expenses driving negative operating margins of -51%. Competitive advantage historically centered on regulatory compliance infrastructure for real-money gaming across US states, though this moat has eroded as competitors entered the market.
Monthly Active User (MAU) growth or contraction rates, particularly in core US market
Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) trends and user engagement metrics (sessions per user, tournament entry frequency)
Cash burn rate and runway to profitability or additional financing needs given negative operating cash flow
Regulatory developments affecting real-money gaming legality across US states and international markets
Partnership announcements with major game developers or distribution platforms
Regulatory risk from evolving real-money gaming laws across US states and potential federal legislation that could restrict or prohibit cash-based mobile gaming competitions
Technological disruption from major gaming platforms (Apple Arcade, Google Play Pass, console manufacturers) integrating competitive features directly into their ecosystems, bypassing third-party platforms
Secular shift in mobile gaming monetization away from competitive cash tournaments toward battle passes, in-app purchases, and advertising-based models
Intense competition from established gaming companies (Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts, Take-Two) launching their own esports and competitive gaming platforms with superior content and distribution
Developer attrition as game studios build direct-to-consumer competitive features rather than relying on Skillz's platform, reducing available game inventory
User acquisition cost inflation as digital advertising becomes more expensive and iOS privacy changes (App Tracking Transparency) reduce targeting effectiveness
Significant cash burn with negative operating cash flow creating potential need for dilutive equity financing or strategic alternatives within 12-18 months based on current burn rate
Goodwill and intangible assets on balance sheet potentially subject to impairment charges if business performance continues deteriorating
Concentration risk in user base with revenue potentially dependent on small percentage of high-value players whose loss would materially impact results
moderate-to-high - Discretionary entertainment spending on mobile gaming competitions is sensitive to consumer confidence and disposable income levels. During economic downturns, users may reduce cash tournament entries or shift to free-to-play alternatives. However, mobile gaming can also serve as affordable entertainment during recessions. The platform's reliance on a relatively small base of high-spending users creates concentration risk to consumer spending patterns.
Rising interest rates negatively impact Skillz through multiple channels: (1) higher discount rates compress valuation multiples for unprofitable growth companies, (2) reduced risk appetite shifts investor capital away from speculative technology stocks, (3) potential reduction in venture capital availability for continued funding if needed. The company's negative cash flow makes it vulnerable to tighter financial conditions. Lower rates would support valuation multiples and improve access to growth capital.
Minimal direct credit exposure given zero debt and strong current ratio of 4.36x. However, the company's negative cash flow creates dependency on equity capital markets for potential future financing, making it vulnerable to credit market conditions that affect investor risk appetite for unprofitable technology companies.
Speculative growth investors and distressed/turnaround specialists. The stock historically attracted momentum and growth-at-any-price investors during the SPAC boom, but current distressed valuation (0.6x sales, down 44% over one year) now appeals to deep value investors betting on stabilization or strategic acquisition. High volatility and negative cash flow make this unsuitable for income or conservative growth investors. The profile has shifted from growth to speculative turnaround.
high - Micro-cap stock ($100M market cap) with low institutional ownership, negative cash flow, and binary outcomes creates extreme volatility. Stock has declined 60% over six months and 39% over three months, demonstrating susceptibility to momentum selling and liquidity concerns. Beta likely exceeds 2.0x relative to broader market given speculative nature and operational uncertainty.