Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Cleanaway Waste Management Limited is Australia's largest integrated waste management company, operating collection, processing, treatment, and disposal infrastructure across solid, liquid, and industrial waste streams. The company operates landfills, recycling facilities, and collection fleets serving municipal, commercial, and industrial customers primarily in Australia's eastern seaboard markets. Stock performance is driven by contract renewals, landfill airspace utilization, recycling commodity prices, and regulatory tailwinds from circular economy policies.
Cleanaway generates revenue through long-term municipal collection contracts (5-10 year terms providing stable base), commercial collection services with pricing power from route density, and landfill tipping fees with high incremental margins once sites are permitted. The company benefits from vertical integration - owning collection assets, transfer stations, processing facilities, and disposal sites - capturing margin at each stage. Landfills provide annuity-like economics with 20-40 year operating lives and limited competition due to permitting barriers. Pricing power stems from essential service nature, high switching costs, and regulatory compliance requirements that favor scale operators.
Municipal contract wins and renewals - large tenders (e.g., Sydney, Melbourne metro contracts) can represent 5-10% of revenue
Landfill airspace utilization and pricing - volumetric intake growth and annual CPI-plus price escalators drive EBITDA
Recycling commodity prices - paper, cardboard, plastics, metals pricing affects processing margins and contamination costs
M&A activity - industry consolidation opportunities and bolt-on acquisitions for route density
Regulatory changes - landfill levies, waste-to-energy policies, circular economy mandates affecting competitive dynamics
Circular economy transition reducing waste generation - extended producer responsibility, reuse mandates, and waste reduction targets could structurally lower volumes by 10-20% over 15-20 years
Recycling market volatility - China's National Sword policy precedent shows commodity price crashes and contamination standards can eliminate processing margins, requiring landfill disposal of recyclables
Landfill alternatives - waste-to-energy, advanced recycling technologies, and composting mandates could reduce high-margin landfill volumes, though permitting barriers protect existing sites
Municipal contract tender risk - competitive bidding every 5-10 years creates revenue cliffs if contracts lost to competitors (Veolia, Suez, regional players)
Limited pricing power in competitive commercial markets - small haulers and regional operators compete on price in fragmented commercial collection, pressuring yield growth outside contracted municipal business
Landfill remediation liabilities - environmental provisions for site closure and post-closure monitoring represent long-dated obligations sensitive to discount rate assumptions and regulatory changes
Capex intensity - fleet replacement cycles and landfill cell construction require $300M+ annual capex (60% of operating cash flow), limiting financial flexibility and dividend capacity
moderate - Municipal waste volumes (40-45% of business) are non-discretionary and stable through cycles. Commercial and industrial waste (55-60%) correlates with construction activity, manufacturing output, and retail spending. Construction and demolition waste is highly cyclical, while food waste from hospitality tracks consumer spending. Overall revenue typically declines 5-10% in recessions but recovers faster than GDP due to essential service nature.
Rising rates create moderate headwinds through higher financing costs on debt (0.59x D/E ratio) used for landfill development and fleet capex. Waste management trades at utility-like multiples (11.1x EV/EBITDA), so rising rates compress valuation multiples as bond yields become more attractive. However, inflation-linked contract escalators (CPI-plus pricing in municipal contracts) provide partial offset. Acquisition financing becomes more expensive, slowing M&A-driven growth.
Minimal direct credit exposure. Municipal contracts provide government-backed receivables with low default risk. Commercial customers are diversified across sectors. Working capital cycles are favorable with upfront collection fees. Primary credit sensitivity is indirect - tighter credit conditions reduce construction activity and business formation, lowering C&I waste volumes.
value and dividend - Attracts defensive income investors seeking stable cash flows and 3-4% dividend yields. Essential services nature and inflation-linked pricing appeal to investors hedging inflation risk. Modest growth profile (sub-5% organic revenue growth) and utility-like characteristics attract value investors at 11-12x EV/EBITDA. Limited appeal to growth investors given mature Australian market and capital-intensive expansion model.
low to moderate - Beta typically 0.7-0.9 reflecting defensive characteristics and regulated utility-like cash flows. Stock volatility increases around major contract tenders and commodity price swings affecting recycling margins. Liquidity constraints in Australian market can amplify moves on low volume days.