SPAC market structural headwinds - poor historical de-SPAC performance (median -40% to -60% post-merger) has reduced investor appetite and increased redemption rates, making it difficult to complete transactions with adequate capital
Regulatory scrutiny from SEC on SPAC accounting (warrant liability treatment), disclosure requirements, and projections has increased legal costs and deal timeline uncertainty
Approaching statutory deadline risk - if CUB cannot identify and close a qualifying transaction within its charter timeframe (typically 18-24 months from IPO, with possible extensions), it must liquidate and return trust assets to shareholders
Intense competition from 200+ active SPACs seeking quality merger targets, creating seller's market dynamics and valuation inflation for attractive private companies
Direct listing and traditional IPO alternatives provide private companies with established exit paths that avoid SPAC-specific dilution and reputational concerns
Sponsor team track record and industry relationships are critical differentiators - unknown or unproven sponsors struggle to access premium deal flow
Trust account redemption risk - high redemption rates (60-90% common in recent SPACs) can leave insufficient capital for post-merger operations, requiring dilutive PIPE financing or deal termination
Operating cash burn outside trust - administrative expenses deplete sponsor capital and may require additional funding if merger timeline extends
Warrant liability volatility - accounting treatment of warrants as liabilities creates non-cash mark-to-market fluctuations in reported earnings
StructuralCompetitiveBalance Sheet