Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Autoliv is the world's largest dedicated automotive safety systems supplier, manufacturing airbags, seatbelts, and steering wheels across 27 countries with major production footprints in Europe (40% of revenue), Americas (30%), and China (20%). The company holds approximately 40% global market share in passive safety systems and benefits from structural tailwinds as safety content per vehicle increases from regulatory mandates and advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) integration. Stock performance tracks global light vehicle production volumes, OEM platform wins, and the company's ability to pass through raw material inflation while maintaining mid-teens EBITDA margins.
Autoliv operates as a Tier 1 automotive supplier with multi-year contracts tied to specific vehicle platforms. Revenue is generated per unit produced by OEM customers (GM, Ford, VW, Toyota, etc.) at negotiated prices that typically decline 2-3% annually through productivity commitments. Profitability depends on manufacturing efficiency, scale advantages in global footprint, and engineering capabilities that secure content on new platforms. The company benefits from high barriers to entry due to stringent safety certification requirements, established OEM relationships spanning decades, and capital-intensive production infrastructure. Pricing power is limited by annual price-downs but partially offset by increasing safety content per vehicle (estimated $350-400 per vehicle currently vs $250 a decade ago) driven by regulatory requirements and consumer demand for advanced safety features.
Global light vehicle production volumes, particularly in key markets: North America (SAAR 15-17M units), Europe (13-15M units), and China (25-28M units)
New platform wins and content per vehicle expansion, especially on electric vehicle architectures where safety system integration differs from ICE vehicles
Raw material cost inflation (steel, electronics, fabrics) and ability to negotiate price recovery with OEMs through contractual mechanisms
Operating margin trajectory toward company's 12-14% EBITDA margin target, driven by manufacturing footprint optimization and fixed cost leverage
China market exposure (~20% of revenue) and competitive dynamics with local suppliers gaining share in domestic Chinese OEM programs
Autonomous vehicle adoption could reduce accident rates and potentially decrease demand for certain passive safety systems, though regulatory requirements likely maintain content levels through 2030+
Shift to electric vehicles changes safety system integration and creates opportunities for new entrants (especially Chinese suppliers) without legacy ICE platform relationships, potentially eroding Autoliv's 40% market share
Increasing electronics content in safety systems (sensors, cameras, radar for ADAS) shifts value to semiconductor and software companies, potentially commoditizing mechanical safety components where Autoliv has historically held pricing power
Chinese domestic suppliers (Joyson Safety Systems, Ningbo Joyson) gaining share in world's largest automotive market through lower cost structures and government support for local content
ZF Friedrichshafen and Continental expanding safety systems portfolios through vertical integration, leveraging broader product relationships with OEMs to win safety system contracts
OEM vertical integration risk as manufacturers like Tesla bring more component production in-house, though safety certification barriers remain high
Debt/Equity of 0.95 with $900M net debt provides limited financial flexibility during industry downturns when working capital needs increase and cash generation declines
Pension obligations across European operations (Sweden headquarters) create unfunded liability risk if discount rates decline or longevity assumptions change
Capital intensity of 3-4% of sales required to maintain global manufacturing footprint limits cash available for shareholder returns during margin compression periods
high - Revenue directly correlates with global light vehicle production, which is highly cyclical and sensitive to consumer confidence, employment levels, and GDP growth. During the 2008-2009 recession, global LVP declined 15% and Autoliv's revenue fell proportionally. The company has limited ability to offset volume declines through pricing or mix given contractual structures. However, safety systems are non-discretionary content, providing more stability than discretionary automotive features. Replacement cycle dynamics (average vehicle age ~12 years in US) provide some demand floor, but new vehicle sales drive 100% of Autoliv's revenue.
Rising interest rates negatively impact automotive demand through higher financing costs for consumers (70% of US vehicles purchased with financing) and reduced affordability. Each 100bp increase in auto loan rates historically reduces industry demand by 2-3%. For Autoliv specifically, higher rates also increase the company's borrowing costs on its $900M net debt position (Debt/Equity 0.95), though ~90% is fixed-rate debt limiting near-term P&L impact. Valuation multiples compress as rates rise given the company's cyclical earnings profile and moderate growth characteristics.
Moderate exposure through OEM customer financial health. Autoliv typically receives payment within 60-90 days but faces concentration risk with top 10 customers representing ~70% of revenue. OEM bankruptcies or restructurings (as seen with GM/Chrysler in 2009) can result in payment delays, price concessions, or bad debt. The company maintains trade credit insurance for major customers. Tighter credit conditions also impact automotive dealer inventory financing (floor plan financing), which can reduce OEM production schedules and thus Autoliv's shipment volumes.
value - The stock trades at 0.9x Price/Sales and 7.6x EV/EBITDA, below historical averages, attracting value investors betting on automotive cycle recovery and margin expansion toward 12-14% EBITDA targets. The 7.5% FCF yield and 29.6% ROE appeal to investors seeking cyclical exposure with strong cash generation during up-cycles. Moderate dividend (~2% yield estimated) and share buyback program provide income component. Not a growth stock given mature market position and low single-digit organic growth profile tied to global LVP growth of 2-3% long-term.
moderate-to-high - Beta estimated 1.3-1.5 given direct leverage to cyclical automotive production. Stock experiences 20-30% drawdowns during automotive recession fears but rallies sharply on production recovery expectations. Quarterly earnings volatility driven by OEM production schedule changes, raw material cost swings, and FX translation impacts across global footprint. Recent 24.6% one-year return reflects recovery from 2024 automotive production concerns and margin improvement execution.
