Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Astrana Health operates a physician-centric, technology-powered healthcare delivery platform managing approximately 10,000 physicians across California, Nevada, and other western states, primarily serving Medicare Advantage and managed care populations. The company generates revenue through capitated risk-based contracts where it assumes financial responsibility for patient care, earning margins by managing medical costs below capitation payments. Recent 46.7% revenue growth reflects aggressive M&A activity, but declining profitability (-28.9% net income growth) suggests integration challenges and medical cost pressures in a post-pandemic normalization environment.
Astrana operates under full-risk capitation models where it receives fixed monthly payments per patient from Medicare Advantage plans and commercial insurers, then manages all medical expenses including specialist referrals, hospitalizations, and pharmacy costs. Profitability depends on maintaining medical loss ratios (MLR) below capitation rates through care coordination, utilization management, and preventive care that reduces expensive acute interventions. The 13.3% gross margin reflects the thin spread between capitation revenue and direct medical costs, with operating leverage coming from spreading technology and administrative infrastructure across a larger patient base. Competitive advantages include established physician networks in California markets, proprietary care management technology, and expertise in managing complex Medicare populations.
Medical loss ratio (MLR) performance - ability to keep medical costs at 82-88% of capitated revenue versus budget
Medicare Advantage membership growth and retention rates - organic growth plus acquisition integration success
Quality bonus payments from CMS Star Ratings - 4-star or higher ratings generate 5-10% revenue premiums on Medicare contracts
M&A integration execution - ability to consolidate acquired physician groups without margin deterioration
Regulatory changes to Medicare Advantage reimbursement rates - annual CMS rate updates directly impact capitation revenue
Medicare Advantage reimbursement pressure - CMS has signaled intent to reduce overpayments and tighten risk adjustment coding, potentially cutting capitation rates 2-4% annually through 2028
Regulatory scrutiny of value-based care models - DOJ investigations into upcoding practices and inappropriate risk score inflation across the industry could trigger compliance costs or payment clawbacks
Physician network stability - independent physician groups can terminate management agreements, and competition from UnitedHealth/Optum, CVS/Oak Street, and other aggregators is intensifying for primary care practices
Vertical integration by national payors - UnitedHealth (Optum), Humana, CVS (Oak Street Health, Signify) are building captive physician networks that bypass independent platforms like Astrana
Technology disruption from telehealth and AI-driven care coordination - lower-cost digital-first models could erode the value proposition of traditional physician network management
Regional concentration in California (estimated 70%+ of revenue) - overexposure to single-state regulatory changes, natural disasters, or market saturation limits geographic diversification
Elevated leverage at 1.40 debt/equity with minimal FCF generation ($0.0B) - limits financial flexibility for acquisitions or weathering medical cost spikes without equity dilution
Working capital strain from capitation timing - medical costs are paid immediately while capitation revenue may have 30-60 day lag, creating cash flow volatility visible in the $0.1B operating cash flow
Goodwill impairment risk from aggressive M&A - rapid acquisition pace at 46.7% revenue growth suggests potential overpayment for physician groups if integration fails or reimbursement rates decline
low - Healthcare utilization, particularly for Medicare populations (65+ years), shows minimal correlation to GDP cycles as medical needs are non-discretionary. However, commercial membership (employer-sponsored) can decline during recessions due to job losses. The company's 70%+ Medicare focus provides recession resilience, though Medicaid expansion/contraction in economic downturns affects some managed care contracts.
Rising rates create moderate headwinds through two channels: (1) Higher discount rates compress valuation multiples for growth-oriented healthcare stocks, particularly impacting the 0.3x P/S multiple which could re-rate lower; (2) Increased borrowing costs on the 1.40 debt/equity ratio raise interest expense, though impact is modest given the $1B market cap scale. Offsetting factor: Medicare capitation rates include inflation adjustments that partially correlate with rate environments. The 14.8x EV/EBITDA suggests rate sensitivity is already priced in at current distressed valuation levels.
Moderate exposure through two mechanisms: (1) Counterparty risk from health plan payors - if insurers face financial stress, capitation payment timing or contract renewals could be affected; (2) Acquisition financing capacity - the company's growth strategy relies on debt-funded M&A, and tighter credit conditions (wider spreads) increase deal costs or limit transaction volume. Current 1.40 debt/equity and minimal free cash flow ($0.0B) suggest limited financial flexibility in stressed credit environments.
value/turnaround - The 50% one-year decline, 0.3x P/S, and 14.8x EV/EBITDA suggest deep value investors betting on margin recovery and integration success. Growth investors were attracted by 46.7% revenue growth but have exited due to -28.9% net income decline. Current holder base likely includes distressed/special situations funds and contrarian healthcare specialists willing to tolerate 2-3 year turnaround timelines. Minimal institutional ownership turnover suggests long-term holders are waiting for operational stabilization.
high - The -50% one-year return, -35% six-month decline, and -9% three-month performance demonstrate extreme volatility typical of small-cap healthcare stocks with binary execution risk. Beta likely exceeds 1.5x given the combination of operational leverage, M&A integration uncertainty, and regulatory headline risk. Quarterly earnings likely trigger 10-20% single-day moves as investors react to MLR performance and guidance revisions.
