Net practitioner additions/churn rates - the core metric for network expansion and future revenue visibility
Same-practitioner pellet volume growth - indicates patient retention and treatment frequency within existing base
Reimbursement policy changes - Medicare/commercial payer coverage decisions for BHRT significantly impact patient out-of-pocket costs and demand
Competitive threats from compounding pharmacies offering lower-cost pellet alternatives or regulatory changes affecting compounding rules
moderate - BHRT is largely elective/cash-pay healthcare, making it sensitive to discretionary consumer spending. During economic downturns, patients may delay or discontinue hormone therapy to preserve cash, particularly since many insurance plans provide limited coverage. However, the demographic tailwind of aging Baby Boomers (primary patient population is perimenopausal/menopausal women and men with low testosterone) provides some demand stability. The subscription-like nature of pellet therapy (typically every 3-4 months) creates recurring revenue, but new patient acquisition slows when consumer confidence weakens.
Rising interest rates negatively impact valuation multiples for unprofitable/low-margin growth companies, as evidenced by the 0.5x P/S ratio compression. Higher rates increase the discount rate applied to future cash flows, particularly punishing companies with negative ROE (-32.6%). On the operational side, rate sensitivity is minimal since the business carries negative net debt (Debt/Equity of -1.46 suggests net cash position), eliminating refinancing risk. However, higher rates may reduce consumer willingness to finance elective procedures through credit cards or payment plans.
Regulatory risk from FDA scrutiny of compounded bioidentical hormones - the FDA has historically questioned the safety/efficacy claims of custom-compounded BHRT, and increased enforcement could disrupt the business model or require costly clinical trials
Reimbursement headwinds as payers increasingly scrutinize hormone therapy coverage, particularly for off-label uses or in light of Women's Health Initiative study concerns about hormone risks
Technological disruption from alternative delivery methods (transdermal gels, subcutaneous injections, oral formulations) that offer greater convenience or lower cost
Historically attracted growth investors betting on the recurring revenue platform model and aging demographics tailwind, but the -58% one-year decline and negative ROE have likely shifted the holder base to distressed/value investors looking for turnaround potential or acquisition candidates. The 39.4% FCF yield (if accurate) would attract value investors, though the $0.0B reported cash flows raise data quality concerns. High volatility and small market cap suggest this is a speculative position for risk-tolerant investors rather than core portfolio holdings.
Trend
-22.7% vs SMA 50 · -26.5% vs SMA 200
Momentum
Distribution pattern detected. More selling days than accumulation over the past 20 sessions. Not a conducive environment for a squeeze.
Based on volume distribution analysis. Direct short interest data (short float %, days to cover) is not available in current data sources.
ANALYST ESTIMATES
Analyst consensus estimates · Actuals replace estimates as reported
| Year | Revenue Est. | Rev Gth | EPS Est. | EPS Gth | Range | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2025 | $191.7M $190.2M–$192.8M | — | $0.67 | — | ±1% | Moderate4 |
FY2026(current) | $190.8M $190.4M–$191.3M | ▼ -0.4% | $0.28 | ▼ -57.5% | ±1% | Moderate4 |
FY2027 | $203.6M $202.6M–$205.2M | ▲ +6.7% | $0.36 | ▲ +28.3% | ±1% | Moderate4 |
INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP
BTMD News
About
No description available.
| Symbol | Price | Day % | Mkt Cap↓ | P/E | Rev Grw | Margin | ELO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTMD◀ | $1.97 | +1.03% | $87M | 3.9 | -252.1% | 1407.0% | 1500 |
| $66.13 | -5.07% | $13.0B | — | +12626.1% | -14525.8% | 1500 | |
| $94.92 | -3.79% | $12.6B | — | +3288.2% | -4239.0% | 1500 | |
| $523.69 | -3.00% | $12.1B | — | +43205.3% | -3008.0% | 1500 | |
| $227.72 | -1.96% | $11.7B | — | +6554.5% | -2868.8% | 1500 | |
| $57.90 | -0.86% | $11.2B | 50.3 | +1459.3% | 147.7% | 1500 | |
| $76.67 | -3.79% | $10.8B | — | +2325815.3% | -19.7% | 1500 | |
| Sector avg | — | -2.49% | — | 27.1 | +341813.8% | -3300.9% | 1500 |