Net investment income per share and dividend coverage ratio (NII must exceed distributions)
Non-accrual rates and credit quality metrics (weighted average risk rating of portfolio)
Portfolio yield trends and spread compression vs. funding costs as SOFR fluctuates
New loan origination volumes and deployment pace of capital
high - Middle-market borrowers are more vulnerable to economic downturns than large-cap companies, leading to elevated default risk during recessions. Portfolio companies span cyclical industries (industrials, business services, healthcare), making credit performance highly correlated with GDP growth and corporate earnings. Economic weakness triggers covenant breaches, payment defaults, and asset markdowns that compress NAV and NII.
BDCs have complex rate sensitivity. Rising rates initially benefit NII as floating-rate loan portfolios (typically 90%+ SOFR-based) reprice faster than funding costs, expanding net interest margins. However, sustained high rates stress borrower cash flows, increase refinancing risk, and elevate default probabilities. Falling rates compress portfolio yields faster than funding costs adjust, squeezing margins. The current environment (February 2026) with elevated rates creates margin pressure as borrowers face refinancing challenges.
Private credit market saturation with $1.5 trillion+ in dry powder competing for deals, compressing spreads and loosening underwriting standards
Regulatory risk from potential BDC leverage restrictions or changes to pass-through tax treatment under RIC status
Interest rate volatility creating asset-liability mismatches if funding costs rise faster than portfolio yields adjust
dividend - BDCs are structured to distribute 90%+ of taxable income as dividends to maintain RIC status, attracting income-focused investors seeking 9-11% yields. However, the -29.5% one-year return reflects capital depreciation risk that offsets dividend income. Value investors may be attracted to the 0.9x P/B ratio if they believe credit quality is better than market pricing suggests. Not suitable for growth investors due to structural payout requirements limiting capital appreciation.
No analyst coverage available for this stock.
Trend
+4.0% vs SMA 50 · -6.6% vs SMA 200
Momentum
Accumulation pattern present — more buying days than selling over the past 20 sessions. Volume conditions support gradual price improvement.
Based on volume distribution analysis. Direct short interest data (short float %, days to cover) is not available in current data sources.
BXSL News
Unable to load news
About
No description available.
| Symbol | Price | Day % | Mkt Cap↓ | P/E | Rev Grw | Margin | ELO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL◀ | $24.94 | +0.00% | $5.8B | — | — | 4448.1% | 1500 |
| $397.67 | +0.00% | $2.1T | — | — | — | 1500 | |
| $91.95 | +0.00% | $316.0B | 14.1 | — | 1510.7% | 1500 | |
| $131.46 | +0.00% | $305.1B | 23.7 | — | 1305.9% | 1500 | |
| $184.74 | +0.00% | $286.4B | 27.2 | +862.9% | 1745.9% | 1500 | |
| $146.57 | +0.00% | $279.7B | 21.0 | +597.3% | 2564.4% | 1500 | |
| $88.98 | +0.00% | $251.9B | 14.4 | — | 668.4% | 1500 | |
| Sector avg | — | +0.00% | — | 20.1 | +730.1% | 2040.5% | 1500 |