Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Visual sector performance
CSI Compressco LP provides natural gas compression services and equipment to midstream infrastructure operators, primarily in US onshore basins including the Permian, Haynesville, and Marcellus. The company operates a fleet of compression units (measured in horsepower) that boost natural gas pressure for gathering, processing, and transmission, earning recurring rental revenue from long-term contracts. Stock performance is driven by natural gas production activity, compression utilization rates, and contract pricing power in tight equipment markets.
CSI generates recurring cash flow by deploying compression horsepower under long-term contracts (typically 3-5 years) with midstream operators and producers. Revenue is driven by utilization rates (percentage of fleet deployed) and average monthly rental rates per horsepower. The business model benefits from high switching costs once equipment is installed and integrated into customer infrastructure. Pricing power emerges during periods of tight compression availability when natural gas production growth outpaces equipment supply. Margins depend on maintaining high utilization (85%+ target) and managing maintenance costs on aging fleet assets.
Natural gas production growth in core operating basins (Permian associated gas, Haynesville dry gas) driving compression demand
Fleet utilization rate trends - movement above 85% signals tight market and pricing power
Contract pricing momentum - ability to increase monthly rental rates on new contracts and renewals
Compression equipment supply/demand balance - new unit deliveries from manufacturers vs. industry demand
Natural gas price volatility impacting producer drilling activity and takeaway capacity needs
Energy transition pressure on long-term natural gas demand growth, particularly if electrification and renewable penetration accelerate faster than expected, reducing need for new compression infrastructure beyond 2030-2035 timeframe
Technological shift toward electric-driven compression units (vs. traditional engine-driven) could obsolete portions of existing fleet, requiring significant reinvestment to remain competitive
Regulatory restrictions on methane emissions and flaring could impact natural gas production economics in certain basins, reducing compression demand
Fragmented market with multiple regional competitors and large integrated players (Archrock, USA Compression) creating pricing pressure during periods of equipment oversupply
Customer vertical integration risk - large midstream operators may choose to own compression assets rather than rent, reducing addressable market
New compression unit manufacturing capacity additions could flood market with equipment, depressing utilization and rental rates
Negative equity position (Debt/Equity of -45.28x) indicates accumulated losses exceeding book value, limiting financial flexibility and increasing refinancing risk
High capital intensity requires ongoing capex for fleet maintenance and growth, consuming most operating cash flow and leaving minimal free cash flow cushion
Negative ROA (-1.4%) and operating margin (-2.5%) indicate the business is currently unprofitable at operating level, creating pressure on debt service coverage if conditions deteriorate
high - Compression demand is directly tied to natural gas production volumes, which correlate with energy sector capital spending and drilling activity. During economic expansions, industrial natural gas demand rises and producers increase output, requiring more compression infrastructure. Recessions typically reduce energy consumption and producer cash flows, leading to drilling pullbacks and lower compression utilization. The 2-3 year lag between production decisions and infrastructure deployment creates cyclical volatility.
Moderate sensitivity through multiple channels. Rising rates increase financing costs for growth capex and fleet expansion, pressuring returns on new equipment investments. Higher rates also reduce customer (E&P and midstream) access to capital, potentially slowing production growth and infrastructure buildouts that drive compression demand. As a master limited partnership structure (historically), the company's distribution yield becomes less attractive relative to fixed income when rates rise, creating valuation pressure. However, contracted recurring revenue provides some insulation from rate volatility.
Moderate credit exposure. Customer creditworthiness matters given long-term contract structures - financial stress among E&P producers or midstream operators could lead to contract terminations or payment delays. The company's own credit profile affects equipment financing costs and liquidity for fleet maintenance. Tightening credit conditions in energy markets reduce customer spending on infrastructure, indirectly impacting compression demand. However, established relationships with investment-grade midstream operators provide some stability.
value/momentum - The 98% one-year return and recent 82% six-month surge attract momentum traders betting on continued compression market recovery. Value investors are drawn to the 0.9x Price/Sales ratio and potential turnaround story as the company moves toward profitability (57% net income growth YoY). The small $300M market cap and partnership structure historically attracted income-focused investors seeking distributions, though current negative margins limit distribution capacity. High volatility and cyclical nature appeal to tactical energy sector traders rather than long-term buy-and-hold investors.
high - As a small-cap energy services company with negative operating margins and high leverage, the stock exhibits significant volatility tied to natural gas price swings, compression market sentiment, and broader energy sector momentum. The 82% six-month return demonstrates explosive upside potential during favorable cycles, but the business's operational and financial fragility creates corresponding downside risk during market downturns. Beta likely exceeds 1.5x relative to energy sector indices.