Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
CytomX Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing Probody therapeutics, a proprietary platform that activates antibody-based drugs selectively in the tumor microenvironment to improve therapeutic index. The company's lead programs target oncology indications with partnerships including Bristol Myers Squibb and AbbVie, generating collaboration revenue while advancing proprietary candidates through Phase 1/2 trials. Recent stock performance reflects positive clinical data readouts and partnership milestone achievements.
CytomX monetizes its Probody platform through upfront licensing fees, research funding, development milestones, and royalties on partnered programs. Partners pay for technology access and fund clinical development, reducing CytomX's cash burn while retaining economics on successful drugs. The company maintains proprietary programs (CX-2051, CX-2029) for potential full commercial rights. High gross margins reflect service-based revenue model with minimal COGS. Operating leverage emerges as fixed R&D infrastructure supports multiple programs simultaneously, though the company remains pre-profitability on a core operating basis despite recent positive net income (likely driven by milestone payments).
Clinical trial data readouts for lead programs (CX-2051 EGFR inhibitor, CX-2029 CD71 antibody-drug conjugate) - interim efficacy and safety results
Partnership announcements, expansions, or milestone payments from BMS, AbbVie, or new collaborators
FDA regulatory interactions including IND clearances, clinical hold resolutions, or breakthrough therapy designations
Cash runway updates and financing activities given negative operating cash flow requiring periodic capital raises
Competitive clinical data from other tumor-activated therapeutic platforms or similar mechanism oncology drugs
Clinical trial failure risk inherent to oncology drug development - Phase 2/3 success rates historically 15-30% for cancer therapeutics, with Probody platform unproven at commercial scale
Platform technology risk if tumor microenvironment activation proves insufficient for meaningful therapeutic index improvement versus conventional antibodies
Regulatory pathway uncertainty for novel mechanism requiring FDA to establish appropriate safety/efficacy benchmarks without historical precedent
Partnership dependency creates revenue concentration risk - loss of major partner or program termination eliminates funding and validation
Multiple competing tumor-activated therapeutic platforms (Mersana, Sutro, Bicycle) targeting similar therapeutic index improvement goals with alternative mechanisms
Large pharma internal programs developing next-generation antibody-drug conjugates and bispecifics may achieve similar selectivity without licensing external platforms
Fast-follower risk if Probody mechanism validates - larger biotechs could develop competing protease-activated systems with greater resources
Cash burn of approximately $100M annually requires periodic capital raises creating dilution risk for existing shareholders
Current $900M market cap with negative free cash flow suggests valuation dependent on successful clinical execution - binary outcomes likely
Minimal debt provides flexibility but also indicates limited non-dilutive financing options available, forcing equity raises in potentially unfavorable market conditions
low - Pre-revenue biotech with partnership-driven model is largely insulated from consumer spending and GDP fluctuations. Clinical trial timelines and regulatory processes proceed independently of economic cycles. However, severe recessions can impact pharma partner budgets for external collaborations and willingness to exercise options or expand deals.
Rising rates create significant headwinds through multiple channels: (1) higher discount rates compress NPV of distant future cash flows, disproportionately impacting pre-revenue biotechs, (2) increased competition from risk-free yields reduces appetite for speculative growth equities, (3) higher financing costs for future capital raises dilute existing shareholders. The 562% one-year return suggests prior rate-driven compression reversed as rate expectations moderated. Current 3.64x current ratio provides buffer but negative $100M operating cash flow requires ongoing capital access.
Minimal direct credit exposure given low debt/equity ratio of 0.05 and partnership revenue model. However, credit market conditions indirectly affect ability to raise capital through equity or convertible debt offerings. Tighter credit conditions can reduce biotech IPO/follow-on activity and force more dilutive financing terms. Pharma partner financial health matters for milestone payment reliability.
growth/momentum - Clinical-stage biotech attracts speculative growth investors betting on binary clinical outcomes and platform validation. The 562% one-year return and 175% six-month return indicate strong momentum investor participation. High volatility and negative cash flow deter value and income investors. Institutional ownership likely includes specialized healthcare funds and venture-stage biotech investors comfortable with multi-year development timelines and clinical risk.
high - Clinical-stage biotechs exhibit extreme volatility around data readouts, regulatory decisions, and financing events. Small market cap ($900M) amplifies price swings. Recent 48% three-month return following 175% six-month gain demonstrates characteristic boom-bust patterns. Options market likely prices significant implied volatility reflecting binary clinical trial outcomes.
