Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Firefly Aerospace is a small-cap launch services provider operating Alpha and planned Beta rockets from Vandenberg Space Force Base and Cape Canaveral, competing in the small-to-medium LEO launch market against Rocket Lab and SpaceX's rideshare programs. The company is in capital-intensive growth phase with negative margins as it scales launch cadence and develops lunar lander capabilities through its Blue Ghost program for NASA CLPS contracts. Stock performance reflects execution risk in achieving commercial launch reliability and transitioning from development-stage losses to operational profitability.
Firefly generates revenue through fixed-price launch contracts for Alpha rocket missions (approximately $15M per launch) and cost-plus NASA contracts for lunar lander development and missions. The business model depends on achieving high launch cadence (targeting 12+ launches annually) to absorb fixed manufacturing and infrastructure costs across Vandenberg and Cape Canaveral facilities. Competitive positioning relies on price-per-kilogram advantages versus larger launch vehicles and faster manifest integration than SpaceX rideshare, though margins remain deeply negative during scale-up phase with -344% operating margin reflecting heavy R&D and infrastructure investment.
Launch success rate and mission execution - any anomaly or failure significantly impacts customer confidence and stock valuation in nascent commercial space market
Launch cadence acceleration toward 12+ annual missions required for positive EBITDA, with manifest backlog visibility
Blue Ghost lunar lander program milestones and additional NASA CLPS contract awards beyond current missions
Capital raise announcements and cash runway visibility given -$200M annual cash burn and $3.3B market cap
Competitive wins against Rocket Lab's Electron and SpaceX rideshare in Department of Defense and commercial satellite constellation contracts
SpaceX Starship achieving full reusability could reduce launch costs to $10-20/kg versus Firefly's $30,000+/kg, making small dedicated launchers economically obsolete for many missions
Satellite miniaturization and rideshare proliferation reducing demand for dedicated small launch vehicles as customers accept schedule flexibility for 70% cost savings
Export control restrictions (ITAR/EAR) limiting international market access and requiring costly compliance infrastructure versus foreign competitors
Rocket Lab's Electron has 40+ successful launches versus Firefly's early operational record, with Neutron medium-lift vehicle threatening Beta rocket's market positioning before Firefly achieves operational status
SpaceX rideshare program offers $1M per 200kg to sun-synchronous orbit versus Firefly's $15M dedicated launch, capturing price-sensitive customers willing to accept manifest delays
Emerging Chinese launch providers (Galactic Energy, iSpace) offering sub-$10M launches with government subsidies in international markets
Negative $200M annual operating cash flow with $3.3B market cap implies 16-20 quarters of cash at current burn rate, creating near-term dilution risk from equity raises
Negative gross margins (-18.7%) indicate company is losing money on every launch at current scale, requiring significant volume growth before unit economics turn positive
Customer prepayments and milestone-based NASA contracts may create working capital volatility and revenue recognition lumpiness
moderate - Launch services demand is partially insulated by multi-year government contracts (NASA, DoD, NRO) representing 40-50% of backlog, but commercial satellite operators reduce constellation deployment during economic downturns or capital market stress. Venture-backed space startups that comprise significant customer base face funding challenges in risk-off environments, delaying launch purchases.
High interest rates negatively impact Firefly through multiple channels: (1) higher cost of capital for internal financing needs given ongoing cash burn, (2) reduced venture capital funding for space startup customers who defer satellite launches, (3) lower valuation multiples for unprofitable growth companies as discount rates rise, and (4) potential difficulty raising growth capital at attractive terms. The company's 32.5x price-to-sales multiple compresses significantly when risk-free rates exceed 4%.
Moderate exposure to credit conditions through customer base composition. Commercial satellite operators and venture-backed space companies require access to growth capital and project financing to fund constellation deployments. Credit market tightening reduces launch demand from these customers, though government contracts provide partial buffer. Firefly's own minimal debt (0.05 D/E) limits direct credit risk but high cash burn creates refinancing risk.
growth - Attracts speculative growth investors betting on commercial space market expansion and Firefly's ability to achieve operational scale before cash runway exhausts. The -380% net margin and -$200M cash burn appeal to venture-style public market investors willing to accept 5-7 year profitability timelines. High volatility (65% decline over 12 months) and binary execution risk around launch success/failure creates momentum trading opportunities but deters value and income investors.
high - Stock exhibits extreme volatility with 65% decline over 12 months and 56% six-month drawdown, reflecting binary outcomes around launch success/failure, capital raise timing, and competitive contract wins. Small float and $3.3B market cap amplify price swings on company-specific news. Typical daily volatility exceeds 5-8% around launch events and earnings releases.
