Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Visual sector performance
Fisker Inc. is a defunct electric vehicle manufacturer that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in June 2024 after failing to secure emergency financing. The company produced the Ocean SUV at Magna Steyr's facility in Graz, Austria, but delivered fewer than 10,000 vehicles before collapsing due to quality issues, production delays, cash burn exceeding $100M per quarter, and inability to scale operations. The stock trades as a distressed equity with near-zero enterprise value following asset liquidation.
Fisker operated an asset-light model outsourcing manufacturing to Magna Steyr in Austria, attempting to generate margin through design, software, and brand premium. The business model failed due to negative gross margins of -37.7%, indicating unit economics never achieved profitability - each vehicle sold destroyed value. The company burned $700M in operating cash annually while generating only $300M in revenue, creating an unsustainable 233% cash burn rate relative to sales. Pricing power was non-existent as quality issues forced discounting and the company lacked scale to negotiate favorable supplier terms.
Bankruptcy proceedings and creditor recovery rates - equity holders typically receive zero in Chapter 11 liquidations
Residual asset sale announcements (intellectual property, remaining inventory, tooling rights)
Litigation outcomes related to shareholder lawsuits and creditor claims
Delisting proceedings and OTC trading dynamics for distressed securities
Total business failure - company is in Chapter 11 bankruptcy liquidation with equity likely worthless under absolute priority rules
EV startup mortality rate exceeds 90% - capital intensity, technology risk, and incumbent competition create insurmountable barriers for undercapitalized entrants
Contract manufacturing model failed - Magna Steyr relationship provided no cost advantage while eliminating operational control and quality oversight
Tesla, BYD, and legacy OEMs (Ford, GM, VW) possess scale, vertical integration, charging infrastructure, and brand equity that Fisker could never replicate
Rivian and Lucid, despite similar struggles, secured multi-billion dollar backing (Amazon/Saudi PIF) that Fisker lacked, highlighting capital as existential competitive advantage
Negative equity of $1.3B and current ratio of 1.02 indicated insolvency months before bankruptcy filing
Free cash flow of -$900M annually with only $300M revenue created 36-month runway to zero assuming no additional financing
Debt/equity ratio of -13.33 reflects complete capital structure inversion - liabilities exceed assets by order of magnitude
high - Premium EVs priced above $60,000 exhibit extreme sensitivity to discretionary spending, consumer confidence, and wealth effects. However, Fisker's bankruptcy was driven by operational failure rather than cyclical demand weakness. The company collapsed during a period of robust EV adoption, indicating idiosyncratic execution risk overwhelmed macro factors.
Rising rates contributed to Fisker's demise by: (1) increasing financing costs for capital-intensive manufacturing operations, (2) reducing consumer ability to finance $69,000 vehicles as auto loan rates exceeded 7%, (3) eliminating access to growth equity capital as investors rotated away from unprofitable EV startups, and (4) making the $150M convertible debt burden unsustainable. The company's negative equity of -$1.3B and debt/equity ratio of -13.33 reflected complete capital structure collapse.
Critical - Fisker's bankruptcy was precipitated by inability to secure $150M emergency financing in Q2 2024. The company had no investment-grade credit access, relied on dilutive equity raises and convertible debt, and faced supplier payment defaults that halted production. Credit market tightening in 2023-2024 eliminated the venture debt and SPAC financing that previously sustained unprofitable EV startups.
distressed debt specialists and bankruptcy arbitrageurs - equity holders are primarily retail investors facing total loss. The stock exhibits lottery ticket dynamics with 98% drawdown attracting speculative traders betting on improbable restructuring outcomes. No institutional quality investors hold positions given bankruptcy status and negative book value.
extreme - 3-month return of -89% and 1-year return of -98% reflect terminal decline volatility. Post-bankruptcy, the stock trades on OTC markets with bid-ask spreads exceeding 20%, minimal liquidity, and daily price swings of 30-50% driven by retail speculation rather than fundamental developments. Implied volatility exceeds 200% for any remaining options.
