Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Genesis Energy operates critical midstream infrastructure across three segments: offshore Gulf of Mexico pipeline transportation (Genesis CHOPS system serving deepwater production), onshore soda ash and refinery services (including Wyoming trona processing facilities), and marine transportation (fleet of 70+ inland barges serving Gulf Coast refineries). The company generates fee-based cash flows from long-term contracts, but faces elevated leverage (12.77x D/E) and negative net margins despite strong FCF generation.
Genesis generates predominantly fee-based revenues through take-or-pay contracts and minimum volume commitments, insulating cash flows from commodity price volatility. Offshore pipeline assets benefit from high barriers to entry in deepwater Gulf of Mexico infrastructure. Soda ash operations leverage captive Wyoming trona reserves with processing facilities tied to long-term industrial customer contracts. Marine transportation earns day rates and voyage fees from refinery customers requiring Jones Act-compliant vessels. The MLP structure historically distributed most cash flow to unitholders, though distributions were cut significantly to address leverage concerns.
Gulf of Mexico offshore drilling activity and deepwater production volumes flowing through CHOPS pipeline system
Soda ash pricing and industrial demand from glass manufacturing, chemicals, and detergent sectors
Gulf Coast refinery utilization rates driving demand for marine transportation and sulfur services
Leverage reduction progress and distribution coverage ratio improvements given elevated 12.77x debt-to-equity
Crude oil price volatility affecting producer drilling decisions and offshore production economics
Energy transition reducing long-term offshore drilling activity in Gulf of Mexico as majors shift capital to renewables and onshore shale
MLP tax structure becoming less attractive to retail investors, limiting access to equity capital for deleveraging
Declining US refinery capacity over 2020-2025 period reducing demand for marine transportation and refinery services
Larger integrated midstream competitors (Enterprise Products, Energy Transfer) with stronger balance sheets able to offer more competitive rates
Offshore pipeline assets face competition from newer deepwater infrastructure with higher capacity and efficiency
Marine transportation competes with truck and rail alternatives for short-haul petroleum product movements
Extreme leverage at 12.77x debt-to-equity with negative net margins creating refinancing and covenant risk
Current ratio of 0.98 indicates potential near-term liquidity constraints if operating cash flow deteriorates
Limited financial flexibility to fund growth capex or pursue acquisitions given debt burden and distribution obligations
moderate - Offshore pipeline volumes correlate with oil prices and drilling economics, which are cyclical. Soda ash demand is tied to industrial production (glass manufacturing, chemicals) showing moderate GDP sensitivity. Marine transportation follows Gulf Coast refinery activity, which is relatively stable but influenced by refined product demand. Fee-based contracts with minimum commitments dampen cyclicality versus commodity-exposed E&P companies.
High sensitivity given elevated 12.77x debt-to-equity ratio. Rising rates increase refinancing costs on floating-rate debt and make distribution yields less attractive relative to fixed income alternatives. The company's negative net margin and high leverage amplify refinancing risk. Lower rates would reduce interest expense and improve distribution coverage, while higher rates pressure already-constrained cash flows available for unitholders.
Significant exposure given high leverage and negative ROE of -162.3%. Credit market conditions affect refinancing ability and covenant compliance. Tightening credit spreads (lower BAMLH0A0HYM2) improve access to capital markets for debt refinancing, while widening spreads increase borrowing costs and refinancing risk. The company requires stable credit markets to manage 2027-2028 debt maturities.
value - Attracts distressed/turnaround investors focused on deleveraging story and high FCF yield of 11.7%. The 43.6% one-year return suggests momentum traders have participated in recovery trade. Income-focused MLP investors remain cautious given distribution cut history and coverage concerns. Not suitable for growth investors given -45% revenue decline and mature asset base.
high - Small-cap MLP with elevated leverage exhibits high volatility. Beta likely exceeds 1.5 given sensitivity to oil prices, credit markets, and MLP sector sentiment. Recent 13.6% three-month move demonstrates continued volatility despite recovery from 2020-2021 lows.
