Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
MongoDB operates a leading document-oriented NoSQL database platform with a dual distribution model: Atlas (fully-managed cloud DBaaS) and Enterprise Advanced (self-managed on-premises/hybrid). The company has captured significant market share in modern application development through its flexible JSON-like document model, particularly strong in cloud-native microservices architectures. Atlas represents the primary growth engine, delivering ~70% of revenue with superior unit economics compared to legacy on-premises offerings.
MongoDB monetizes through a land-and-expand model where developers adopt the free Community Edition, then organizations convert to paid Atlas or Enterprise Advanced as workloads scale. Atlas generates revenue through consumption-based pricing (compute, storage, data transfer) with gross margins exceeding 75%, while Enterprise Advanced uses annual subscription licensing. Competitive advantages include developer mindshare (6M+ downloads monthly), multi-cloud portability (AWS, Azure, GCP), and vector search capabilities for AI workloads. The company benefits from workload migration from legacy relational databases (Oracle, SQL Server) and greenfield cloud-native application development.
Atlas revenue growth rate and consumption trends (workload expansion vs new customer acquisition mix)
Net ARR expansion rate and customer cohort retention metrics (particularly $100K+ customers)
Operating margin trajectory and path to sustained profitability (balance between growth investment and margin expansion)
Enterprise Advanced renewal rates and on-premises to Atlas migration velocity
Competitive positioning against AWS DocumentDB, Azure Cosmos DB, and emerging vector database providers
Cloud hyperscaler competition intensifying as AWS (DocumentDB), Azure (Cosmos DB), and GCP build native database services with tighter platform integration and potentially predatory pricing
Open-source licensing model vulnerability - while MongoDB shifted to SSPL in 2018, forks and alternative implementations could fragment ecosystem or reduce pricing power
AI/ML workload shift toward purpose-built vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) potentially commoditizing general-purpose document databases for emerging use cases
AWS DocumentDB compatibility layer directly targets MongoDB workloads with lower pricing and seamless AWS service integration, particularly threatening for price-sensitive customers
Incumbent relational database vendors (Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server) defending installed base through modernization initiatives and hybrid cloud offerings
Emerging specialized databases (Snowflake for analytics, Databricks for lakehouse) capturing budget share in data infrastructure spending
Minimal balance sheet risk given negligible debt and strong liquidity position with $1.9B+ cash equivalents
Stock-based compensation represents ~20-25% of revenue, creating dilution risk and potential cash tax obligations as equity vests
Negative working capital dynamics if growth decelerates rapidly while deferred revenue unwinds, though current 5.25x current ratio provides substantial buffer
moderate - MongoDB exhibits defensive growth characteristics as existing workloads generate recurring consumption revenue, but new workload creation and enterprise buying decisions correlate with IT spending cycles. During economic slowdowns, customers may optimize database usage (compression, tiering) reducing consumption growth, and elongated sales cycles impact new logo acquisition. However, secular shift from legacy databases to modern cloud platforms provides partial insulation from cyclical downturns.
Rising interest rates create dual pressure: (1) valuation multiple compression as high-growth, unprofitable software trades at lower P/S multiples when risk-free rates increase, and (2) enterprise customers scrutinize cloud consumption spending more carefully, potentially slowing Atlas workload expansion. However, MongoDB's improving profitability profile (positive operating cash flow, narrowing losses) reduces sensitivity compared to pure cash-burn growth stories. Lower rates support higher valuation multiples and easier enterprise spending environment.
Minimal direct credit exposure. MongoDB maintains fortress balance sheet (0.01 D/E, 5.25x current ratio) with no meaningful debt. Indirect exposure exists through customer credit quality - financial stress among enterprise customers could impact renewal rates or payment terms, but subscription model with annual prepayment reduces receivables risk. Tight credit conditions may slow venture-backed startup customer growth, though enterprise segment provides stability.
growth - MongoDB attracts growth-oriented investors seeking exposure to cloud infrastructure secular trends and database modernization. The 19% revenue growth, improving unit economics, and large TAM ($100B+ database market) appeal to investors willing to accept near-term losses for long-term market share gains. Recent 62% six-month return reflects momentum investor participation. Institutional ownership concentrated among technology-focused growth managers (T. Rowe Price, Fidelity, ARK) rather than value or income investors given negative earnings and no dividend.
high - Software infrastructure stocks with 12.4x P/S multiples and negative EBITDA exhibit elevated volatility (estimated beta 1.3-1.5x). Stock highly sensitive to quarterly guidance revisions, competitive announcements from AWS/Azure, and broader SaaS multiple compression/expansion cycles. The 62% six-month surge followed by more modest recent performance illustrates momentum-driven volatility. Options market typically prices 50-60% implied volatility around earnings events.
