Acquisition volume and deployment pace - ability to source $40-80 million annually in accretive deals at target 7-9% cap rates
Weighted average lease term (WALT) - maintaining 10+ years signals portfolio quality and cash flow visibility
Same-store occupancy and rent collection rates - critical for net-lease model, target 98-100% collection
Cost of capital spreads - differential between acquisition cap rates and blended debt/equity costs drives NAV accretion
moderate - Necessity-based retail tenants (convenience stores, dollar stores, auto service) demonstrate counter-cyclical or recession-resistant characteristics, with stable traffic during downturns. However, acquisition volumes decline in recessions as sellers delay transactions and financing becomes scarce. Regional economic weakness in secondary markets (manufacturing-dependent Midwest towns) can pressure tenant viability. Estimated 60-70% correlation to broader retail sales trends, but defensive tenant mix provides downside protection.
Rising rates create multiple headwinds: (1) Higher cost of debt reduces acquisition spreads and FFO accretion - each 100bp increase in borrowing costs reduces investment returns by similar magnitude; (2) Cap rate expansion pressure as buyers demand higher yields, compressing property values 10-15% for every 100bp move; (3) Equity valuation compression as REIT yields become less attractive versus risk-free rates - historical 70-80% correlation between 10-year Treasury moves and REIT price performance; (4) Refinancing risk on maturing debt, though long-term fixed-rate strategy mitigates near-term exposure. Partially offset by floating-rate lease escalators (estimated 20-30% of leases) and ability to pause acquisitions during high-rate environments.
E-commerce disruption to retail tenants - while necessity-based categories show resilience, long-term shift to online ordering for convenience items (groceries, auto parts) could pressure tenant viability and rent coverage ratios over 10-15 year lease terms
Secondary market demographic decline - properties concentrated in smaller MSAs face population outmigration risk, reducing customer traffic and tenant sales productivity, particularly in Rust Belt locations
Climate and natural disaster exposure - Sun Belt concentration creates hurricane, flood, and extreme heat risks that could impair property values and increase insurance costs, with limited geographic diversification
dividend - Net-lease REITs attract income-focused investors seeking stable, tax-advantaged distributions (estimated 4-6% yield). The necessity-based retail focus appeals to defensive value investors looking for recession-resistant cash flows. Small-cap size and 40%+ six-month return suggests recent momentum interest, though limited liquidity constrains institutional ownership. Typical shareholder base includes retail investors, income funds, and specialized REIT investors willing to accept illiquidity premium for higher yields versus large-cap alternatives.
Trend
-1.6% vs SMA 50 · +10.9% vs SMA 200
Momentum
Volume distribution is neutral or leaning toward distribution. No compelling squeeze setup based on current money flow data.
Based on volume distribution analysis. Direct short interest data (short float %, days to cover) is not available in current data sources.
ANALYST ESTIMATES
Analyst consensus estimates · Actuals replace estimates as reported
| Year | Revenue Est. | Rev Gth | EPS Est. | EPS Gth | Range | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2025 | $59.2M $58.3M–$60.2M | — | -$0.23 | — | ±2% | High6 |
FY2026(current) | $74.4M $70.2M–$78.5M | ▲ +25.6% | $0.35 | — | ±1% | Moderate4 |
FY2027 | $77.7M $73.0M–$86.9M | ▲ +4.5% | $0.38 | ▲ +6.3% | ±10% | High6 |
Dividend per payment — last 8 periods
INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP
PINE News
About
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust that acquires, owns and operates a portfolio of high-quality single-tenant net leased commercial income properties.
| Symbol | Price | Day % | Mkt Cap↓ | P/E | Rev Grw | Margin | ELO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PINE◀ | $18.73 | -1.42% | $310M | 411.8 | +1590.2% | -438.9% | 1500 |
| $213.74 | -1.84% | $150.9B | 106.3 | +3582.4% | 878.3% | 1507 | |
| $140.53 | -1.49% | $131.0B | 35.2 | +717.6% | 3880.1% | 1510 | |
| $1059.44 | -1.87% | $104.5B | 73.3 | +585.3% | 1457.9% | 1531 | |
| $170.63 | +0.08% | $79.5B | 27.6 | +511.4% | 2376.5% | 1484 | |
| $188.51 | -2.25% | $66.2B | 47.2 | +1004.0% | 2140.8% | 1516 | |
| $200.02 | -1.37% | $65.0B | 13.8 | +671.9% | 7251.1% | 1506 | |
| Sector avg | — | -1.45% | — | 102.2 | +1237.5% | 2506.5% | 1508 |