Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Parsons Corporation is a defense and critical infrastructure engineering firm providing technical solutions across cybersecurity, missile defense, space systems, and transportation infrastructure. The company operates through two segments: Federal Solutions (~60% of revenue, serving DoD, intelligence agencies, NASA) and Critical Infrastructure (~40%, serving transportation, water, environmental clients). Stock performance is driven by federal defense budget allocations, classified program wins, and large-scale infrastructure project awards.
Parsons generates revenue through multi-year government and commercial contracts for engineering, technical services, and program management. Federal Solutions commands higher margins (8-10% operating) due to specialized capabilities in classified programs, cybersecurity, and missile defense where technical barriers limit competition. Critical Infrastructure operates at lower margins (4-6%) in competitive bidding environments for transportation and environmental projects. Pricing power derives from security clearances (70%+ of workforce cleared), proprietary technologies in cyber/space domains, and incumbent positions on IDIQ contracts worth $10B+ in ceiling value. The company benefits from recurring revenue (60%+ of backlog) and contract modifications that extend program life.
Federal defense budget appropriations and continuing resolutions affecting contract funding and new program starts
Major contract awards in missile defense, space systems, or cyber domains (typical awards $100M-$500M)
Book-to-bill ratio and backlog growth, particularly in higher-margin Federal Solutions segment
Infrastructure spending legislation and state DOT budget allocations for transportation projects
Margin performance in Critical Infrastructure segment where competitive pressures impact profitability
Federal budget constraints and debt ceiling negotiations could delay contract awards, reduce program funding, or trigger sequestration-style cuts to discretionary defense spending
Shift toward insourcing by government agencies or preference for small business set-asides could reduce addressable TAM for mid-tier contractors
Cybersecurity threats and data breaches pose reputational and contractual risks given classified program exposure and need to maintain facility clearances
Intense competition from larger defense primes (Lockheed, Northrop, Raytheon) and specialized IT firms (Booz Allen, SAIC, Leidos) on federal contracts, with incumbents holding advantages on recompetes
Commoditization of infrastructure engineering services and aggressive pricing by global firms (AECOM, Jacobs, WSP) pressuring Critical Infrastructure margins below 5%
Loss of key personnel with security clearances to competitors in tight labor market, particularly for cyber and space domain expertise
Working capital intensity with DSO of 70-80 days creates cash flow volatility tied to government payment cycles and contract closeouts
Debt of $350M (0.52 D/E) is manageable but limits M&A flexibility and share repurchase capacity compared to net cash competitors
Pension and post-retirement benefit obligations typical of legacy government contractors, though not disclosed as material in available data
moderate - Federal Solutions (60% of revenue) exhibits low cyclicality due to multi-year defense appropriations and national security priorities that persist through economic cycles. Critical Infrastructure (40%) shows moderate cyclicality tied to state/local government tax revenues, federal infrastructure grants, and private sector construction activity. During recessions, infrastructure maintenance spending may be deferred, but counter-cyclical stimulus (e.g., IIJA legislation) can offset downturns. Overall revenue volatility is dampened by 1.3x backlog-to-revenue ratio and contract durations of 3-7 years.
Rising rates create modest headwinds through higher borrowing costs on the company's $350M debt (0.52 D/E ratio), though most debt is fixed-rate limiting immediate impact. More significantly, higher rates pressure state/local government finances and reduce municipal bond issuance for infrastructure projects, potentially slowing Critical Infrastructure awards. Federal defense spending is largely rate-insensitive. Valuation multiples compress as investors rotate from growth to value, particularly impacting the stock's 14.0x EV/EBITDA multiple which trades above historical averages for engineering firms.
Minimal direct exposure. Government contracts provide stable receivables with low default risk. Working capital requirements are moderate (1.75x current ratio) and the company maintains investment-grade credit profile. Indirect exposure exists if credit tightening reduces private sector infrastructure investment or strains subcontractor financing.
value - The stock trades at 1.1x P/S and 14.0x EV/EBITDA with 6.0% FCF yield, attracting value investors seeking government contract stability and potential margin expansion. Recent 22.5% decline over three months suggests valuation reset from growth expectations. Lack of dividend (implied by data) reduces income investor appeal. Moderate growth profile (historical mid-single-digit organic growth) and defensive characteristics appeal to investors seeking lower-beta exposure to defense/infrastructure themes.
moderate - Government contract revenue provides stability, but stock exhibits volatility around quarterly results due to lumpy contract awards, project timing, and margin variability. Recent performance (-22.5% 3-month, -12.8% 1-year) suggests elevated volatility possibly tied to federal budget uncertainty or specific contract issues. Beta likely in 0.9-1.1 range, below high-growth industrials but above pure-play defense contractors with more predictable program revenue.
