Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
REE Automotive is an Israeli electric vehicle technology company developing modular EV platforms with proprietary corner module technology (REEcorner) that integrates steering, braking, suspension, and drive into the wheel arch. The company targets commercial EV applications including last-mile delivery vans and medium-duty trucks, partnering with OEMs rather than manufacturing vehicles directly. As of March 2026, REE remains pre-revenue with severe cash burn, negative gross margins indicating costs exceed minimal revenue, and critical liquidity concerns given current burn rate.
REE's business model centers on licensing its flat, modular EV platform technology to commercial vehicle manufacturers rather than building complete vehicles. The REEcorner technology eliminates traditional chassis components by moving all drive systems into compact corner modules, theoretically enabling flexible vehicle configurations and lower manufacturing costs. Revenue would derive from per-unit licensing fees, engineering services during integration, and potentially component sales. However, the company has failed to achieve commercial-scale production or meaningful customer adoption, with -1,912% gross margin indicating development costs vastly exceed any revenue recognition. The company lacks pricing power as it competes against established EV platforms from traditional OEMs and other startups.
Announcements of commercial production contracts or binding purchase orders from fleet operators or OEMs
Progress toward production readiness at manufacturing facilities and achievement of engineering validation milestones
Capital raises, dilution events, or going-concern warnings given severe cash burn and minimal revenue
Competitive developments in commercial EV platforms from established players like Rivian, BrightDrop, or traditional OEMs
Regulatory changes affecting commercial EV adoption incentives or mandates in key markets (US, EU, Israel)
Technology obsolescence risk as major OEMs develop proprietary commercial EV platforms with superior scale, integration, and support infrastructure, potentially rendering third-party platform providers unnecessary
Regulatory certification barriers for novel vehicle architectures requiring extensive crash testing, safety validation, and homologation across multiple jurisdictions, delaying commercialization indefinitely
Commercial EV adoption slower than projected due to charging infrastructure gaps, total cost of ownership concerns, and range limitations for medium-duty applications
Established commercial vehicle manufacturers (Daimler, Volvo, Paccar) developing in-house EV platforms with existing customer relationships, service networks, and brand trust
Well-funded EV startups like Rivian (Amazon partnership) and GM's BrightDrop already delivering commercial EVs at scale with proven platforms
Lack of differentiation as corner module technology faces competition from traditional skateboard platforms and integrated e-axle solutions from Tier 1 suppliers
Going concern risk with $100M+ annual cash burn, minimal revenue, and current ratio of 1.74 suggesting less than 2 years of liquidity at current burn rate without additional financing
Severe dilution risk to existing shareholders as company requires hundreds of millions in additional capital to reach commercial production, with stock down 89% over past year limiting equity raise capacity
Negative equity position likely within 12-18 months without revenue inflection or major capital injection, potentially triggering delisting or bankruptcy
high - Commercial vehicle demand is highly cyclical, tied to freight volumes, e-commerce growth, and corporate capital expenditure budgets. Fleet operators delay EV transitions during economic uncertainty. REE's target customers (logistics companies, delivery fleets) reduce capital spending sharply in recessions. Additionally, as a pre-revenue company requiring external financing, REE faces severe funding risk during risk-off market environments when growth equity capital becomes scarce.
High negative sensitivity to rising rates. REE requires continuous equity or debt financing to fund operations given massive cash burn. Higher rates increase discount rates applied to distant future cash flows, compressing valuations for pre-revenue growth companies. Rising rates also reduce customer willingness to finance expensive EV fleet conversions, as commercial buyers face higher financing costs for vehicle purchases. The company's 0.5x price-to-book suggests market already prices significant dilution or failure risk.
Critical exposure to equity capital markets rather than traditional credit. With 1.06 debt-to-equity and negative cash flow, REE cannot access traditional debt financing. The company depends entirely on equity raises or strategic investments to continue operations. Tightening venture capital and SPAC markets directly threaten survival. Customer credit conditions matter secondarily, as fleet operators need financing to purchase commercial EVs.
Highly speculative growth investors willing to accept binary outcomes and near-total loss risk for potential multi-bagger returns if technology achieves commercial adoption. Primarily retail and venture-style investors rather than institutional quality-focused funds. The -89% one-year return, -427% FCF yield, and negative margins indicate this is a distressed speculation rather than fundamental investment. Momentum traders may participate on partnership announcements or technical bounces, but fundamental investors avoid given lack of revenue visibility and existential balance sheet risk.
Extreme volatility with high beta likely exceeding 2.0x. Stock moves violently on any news regarding financing, partnerships, or competitive developments. Illiquid trading given tiny market cap increases price swings. Three-month return of -16.5% understates intraday and weekly volatility. Typical of pre-revenue technology companies with binary outcomes and frequent capital raises causing dilution-driven selloffs.