Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Vestas is the world's largest wind turbine manufacturer by installed capacity, with approximately 175 GW deployed globally across 88 countries. The company operates through two primary segments: Power Solutions (turbine sales and construction) and Service (long-term maintenance contracts averaging 15-25 years). Vestas competes primarily with Siemens Gamesa, GE Renewable Energy, and Goldwind in a market driven by renewable energy mandates, power purchase agreement economics, and grid decarbonization targets.
Vestas generates revenue through upfront turbine sales with thin margins (5-8% operating margin target) followed by high-margin service contracts (15-20% margins) that create annuity-like cash flows over 20+ years. Competitive advantage stems from installed base scale (175 GW creates service revenue moat), modular platform architecture reducing manufacturing costs, and proprietary data analytics optimizing turbine performance. Pricing power depends on steel/copper input costs, competitive intensity in regional tenders, and customer LCOE requirements typically targeting $30-45/MWh all-in costs.
Quarterly order intake (MW) and average selling price per MW, particularly in offshore wind segment where ASPs exceed $1.5M/MW
Service revenue growth rate and contract renewal rates, which signal installed base monetization and customer satisfaction
Gross margin trajectory driven by steel/copper input costs, manufacturing efficiency gains, and pricing discipline in new orders
European and US renewable energy policy developments, including IRA tax credit extensions, EU REPowerEU targets, and offshore wind lease auctions
Competitive win rates in major tenders (US offshore, European onshore repowering, Asia-Pacific expansion)
Grid interconnection bottlenecks in key markets (US, Germany) delaying project commissioning and creating revenue recognition timing risk, with some projects facing 3-5 year queue times
Technological disruption from alternative renewable technologies (solar + storage, green hydrogen) or next-generation turbine designs from Chinese competitors offering 18+ MW offshore platforms
Policy reversal risk in key markets, particularly US IRA provisions under potential political changes or European subsidy reductions as renewable penetration increases transmission costs
Chinese manufacturers (Goldwind, Envision, Mingyang) expanding internationally with 20-30% lower pricing, particularly in price-sensitive emerging markets and potentially Europe
Siemens Gamesa restructuring under Siemens Energy ownership could create more aggressive competitor with deeper balance sheet support
Vertical integration by utilities and developers (Orsted, RWE) developing in-house turbine capabilities or exclusive partnerships with competitors
Working capital intensity with 0.87x debt/equity and 1.00x current ratio leaves limited buffer for project delays or warranty cost overruns
Warranty provisions estimated at 2-3% of revenue create contingent liability if turbine reliability issues emerge in newer 5-6 MW+ platforms
Foreign exchange exposure with revenue in EUR, USD, CNY but costs concentrated in EUR and DKK, creating margin volatility without perfect hedging
moderate - Wind energy demand is driven by long-term decarbonization mandates rather than GDP growth, but project financing availability and corporate PPA appetite correlate with economic confidence. Industrial production growth signals electricity demand expansion, supporting renewable capacity additions. Recession risk primarily impacts project financing costs and utility capital expenditure budgets rather than eliminating demand.
High sensitivity to interest rates through two channels: (1) Project finance costs directly impact wind farm IRRs, with each 100 bps rate increase reducing project NPV by approximately 8-12%, potentially delaying FIDs; (2) Vestas' valuation multiple compresses as rates rise, given long-duration cash flows from service contracts trade similar to infrastructure assets. However, inflation-linked service contracts provide partial hedge. Current environment with rates stabilizing near 4-4.5% is manageable but further increases would pressure order intake.
Moderate credit exposure through project finance availability and customer creditworthiness. Utilities and IPPs require access to investment-grade debt markets to fund multi-billion dollar wind farms. Credit spread widening increases project financing costs and can delay orders. Vestas also carries supplier credit risk in steel and component procurement, though typically hedges 6-12 months forward.
value with growth optionality - Current 1.1x P/S and 14.7x EV/EBITDA multiples reflect compressed margins and execution concerns, attracting value investors betting on margin recovery to 8-10% EBIT targets by 2027-2028. The 83% one-year return indicates momentum investors have entered on improving fundamentals. Long-term ESG and thematic renewable energy investors provide stable base, while the 4.1% FCF yield appeals to quality-focused funds. High ROE of 22.6% despite modest margins signals efficient capital deployment.
high - Beta estimated at 1.3-1.5x given exposure to commodity input costs, EUR/USD fluctuations, policy uncertainty, and project-based revenue lumpiness. Stock exhibits 30-40% annualized volatility with sharp moves on order announcements, margin guidance changes, and renewable policy developments. Recent 83% one-year return demonstrates momentum volatility.
