E.W. Scripps Q1 Earnings Call Highlights
E.W. Scripps NASDAQ: SSP reported first-quarter 2026 results that management said reflected progress…

U.S. Navy shipbuilding budget allocations and Columbia-class SSBN program funding (12 submarines planned, $8-9B per vessel)
Nuclear fuel contract awards and enrichment services demand from commercial reactor fleet (93 operating U.S. reactors)
Medical isotope production capacity expansions and FDA approvals for cancer treatment applications
Defense budget authorization levels and nuclear modernization spending priorities
low - Revenue is 75%+ government contracts with multi-year visibility, insulating from GDP fluctuations. Naval nuclear work is driven by 30-year shipbuilding plans and geopolitical priorities rather than economic cycles. Commercial nuclear fuel demand is tied to baseload electricity generation, which is relatively stable. Medical isotope demand is non-cyclical, driven by cancer treatment protocols.
Rising rates have modest negative impact on valuation multiples given defensive growth profile, but minimal operational impact. BWXT carries moderate debt ($1.5B net debt, 1.2x D/E) with manageable interest expense. Higher rates could pressure commercial nuclear utilities' capital spending on refueling, but impact is limited given contractual commitments. Government contract pricing is not directly rate-sensitive, though higher discount rates compress NPV of long-duration contracts.
Single-customer concentration risk: U.S. Navy represents 60%+ of revenue, creating vulnerability to defense budget cuts or shipbuilding program delays/cancellations
Nuclear regulatory environment: Adverse policy shifts away from nuclear energy (despite recent pro-nuclear sentiment) could pressure commercial fuel demand and limit growth optionality
Technological obsolescence: Next-generation reactor designs (SMRs, microreactors) could require significant R&D investment and manufacturing retooling, though BWXT is positioned as potential supplier
growth - Attracts quality growth investors seeking defense exposure with 8-12% revenue CAGR driven by naval modernization supercycle, nuclear renaissance tailwinds, and medical isotope expansion. Premium valuation (38x EV/EBITDA, 15x P/B) reflects scarcity value of naval nuclear monopoly and visible multi-decade growth runway. Also appeals to ESG-focused investors viewing nuclear as clean energy solution. Recent 91% one-year return suggests momentum factor attraction.
Trend
-3.9% vs SMA 50 · +6.7% vs SMA 200
Momentum
Accumulation pattern present — more buying days than selling over the past 20 sessions. Volume conditions support gradual price improvement.
Based on volume distribution analysis. Direct short interest data (short float %, days to cover) is not available in current data sources.
Analyst consensus estimates · Actuals replace estimates as reported
| Year | Revenue Est. | Rev Gth | EPS Est. | EPS Gth | Range | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2025 | $3.2B $3.1B–$3.2B | — | $3.82 | — | ±1% | High9 |
FY2026(current) | $3.8B $3.8B–$3.8B | ▲ +19.7% | $4.68 | ▲ +22.5% | ±2% | High10 |
FY2027 | $4.1B $4.0B–$4.2B | ▲ +9.4% | $5.21 | ▲ +11.4% | ±3% | High10 |
Dividend per payment — last 8 periods
E.W. Scripps NASDAQ: SSP reported first-quarter 2026 results that management said reflected progress…

bwx technologies, inc. is a leading supplier of nuclear components and fuel to the u.s. government; provides technical, management and site services to support governments in the operation of complex facilities and environmental remediation activities; and supplies precision manufactured components and services for the commercial nuclear power industry. bwxt has more than 5,200 employees and significant operations in lynchburg, virginia; erwin, tennessee; mount vernon, indiana; euclid, ohio; barberton, ohio; and cambridge, ontario, canada, as well as more than a dozen u.s. department of energy sites around the country.
| Symbol | Price | Day % | Mkt Cap↓ | P/E | Rev Grw | Margin | ELO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWXT◀ | $205.21 | -2.17% | $18.9B | 54.6 | +1830.0% | — | 1500 |
| $411.53 | -0.60% | $2.0T | 30.8 | +3296.8% | 4510.0% | 1500 | |
| $140.05 | -0.67% | $307.0B | 24.8 | +586.3% | 1305.9% | 1500 | |
| $90.16 | +1.34% | $300.4B | 13.9 | +318.8% | 1510.7% | 1500 | |
| $182.84 | +0.18% | $283.0B | 26.9 | +862.9% | 1745.9% | 1500 | |
| $146.12 | +0.44% | $277.6B | 20.7 | +597.3% | 2564.4% | 1500 | |
| $83.97 | -0.32% | $254.0B | 12.8 | -612.9% | 668.3% | 1500 | |
| Sector avg | — | -0.26% | — | 26.4 | +982.7% | 2050.8% | 1500 |