Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Douglas Emmett is a concentrated West Coast office and multifamily REIT owning approximately 18 million square feet of Class A office space primarily in Los Angeles (Westside, Warner Center, Sherman Oaks) and Honolulu, plus roughly 4,300 multifamily units. The company faces structural headwinds from elevated office vacancy rates post-pandemic, with performance heavily dependent on tenant retention in entertainment, technology, and professional services sectors that dominate its Westside LA portfolio.
Douglas Emmett generates cash flow through long-term triple-net and modified gross office leases (typically 5-10 year terms) and multifamily leases (12-month terms). The company's competitive advantage historically stemmed from dominant market share in supply-constrained Westside LA submarkets (Brentwood, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills) where new construction is limited by zoning and land scarcity. Pricing power depends on tenant demand from entertainment (Netflix, CAA, WME), technology, and professional services firms. The negative gross margin reflects significant property operating expenses and depreciation typical of REITs, while operating margin captures NOI generation capability.
Office occupancy rates and leasing velocity in Westside LA submarkets - any large tenant renewals or departures (particularly entertainment/tech sector tenants)
Office lease spreads and rental rate trends - ability to maintain or grow rents on lease rollovers despite work-from-home pressures
Multifamily same-store NOI growth - rent growth in LA apartment markets provides stability offset to office weakness
Debt refinancing activity and interest coverage ratios - given elevated leverage and rising rate environment through 2025
Return-to-office trends and office utilization rates among major LA employers
Permanent reduction in office space demand due to hybrid work adoption - many LA employers have implemented 2-3 day in-office policies, reducing space needs per employee by 30-40%
Geographic concentration risk - over 90% of NOI from greater Los Angeles market exposes company to regional economic shocks, California regulatory changes, and local market oversupply
Obsolescence risk for older Class A properties - tenant preference shifting toward newer trophy assets with better amenities, HVAC systems, and collaborative spaces
Competition from newer trophy office developments in Westside LA and Culver City (especially media/tech-focused projects) that offer superior amenities and ESG features
Sublease space overhang - major tenants (entertainment, tech) offering high-quality sublease space at discounted rates undercuts direct leasing
Alternative workspace providers (WeWork successors, Industrious) offering flexible terms that appeal to cost-conscious tenants
Elevated leverage (2.92x debt-to-equity) limits financial flexibility during downturn - debt maturities must be refinanced at significantly higher rates than legacy debt
Declining asset values (0.9x price-to-book) could trigger covenant concerns or limit borrowing capacity if NOI deteriorates further
Limited free cash flow generation (reported $0.0B FCF) after dividends constrains ability to deleverage or fund value-add capex without asset sales
high - Office demand is highly cyclical, driven by corporate employment growth, business formation, and expansion activity. Entertainment and technology sectors (major tenant base) are particularly sensitive to economic conditions and capital availability. Multifamily provides some counter-cyclical stability as renters delay homeownership during downturns, but LA rent growth still correlates with job growth and wage inflation. The -40.4% one-year return reflects investor concerns about structural office demand weakness beyond normal cyclical patterns.
Very high sensitivity through multiple channels: (1) Douglas Emmett's 2.92x debt-to-equity ratio means refinancing risk as debt matures at higher rates, directly impacting FFO; (2) Office REITs trade at spreads to 10-year Treasury yields - rising rates compress valuation multiples (current 0.9x price-to-book suggests market values assets below replacement cost); (3) Higher rates reduce tenant expansion appetite and increase sublease supply as companies optimize space; (4) Cap rate expansion reduces asset values and limits acquisition/disposition flexibility. The 10.6x EV/EBITDA multiple is compressed relative to historical norms due to rate environment.
Moderate exposure. Douglas Emmett must maintain investment-grade credit metrics to access unsecured debt markets at reasonable spreads. Tenant credit quality matters significantly - any major tenant bankruptcies or defaults in entertainment/tech sectors would impair cash flows. The company's ability to refinance maturing debt depends on credit market conditions; high-yield spread widening would increase borrowing costs even if the company maintains investment-grade ratings. Current 0.08 current ratio indicates reliance on operating cash flow and credit facility access for liquidity.
value - The 0.9x price-to-book ratio and distressed one-year performance attract deep value investors betting on office market stabilization and mean reversion. Current investors likely focus on dividend yield (though sustainability is questioned given low FCF) and potential for long-term recovery as return-to-office trends solidify. Not suitable for growth or momentum investors given structural headwinds. Some contrarian real estate investors may view concentrated Westside LA exposure as asymmetric upside if supply constraints eventually tighten markets.
high - The -40.4% one-year return and -31.1% six-month return demonstrate elevated volatility typical of distressed office REITs. Stock is highly sensitive to: (1) any news on major tenant renewals/departures, (2) shifts in return-to-office sentiment, (3) interest rate movements, and (4) broader REIT sector sentiment. Beta likely exceeds 1.5x relative to REIT indices. Small market cap ($1.7B) and concentrated institutional ownership can amplify price swings on low volume.
