Secular shift toward passive EM debt ETFs with lower fees (0.40-0.50%) versus closed-end fund structure with 1%+ expense ratios, causing persistent NAV discounts
Increased correlation between EM and developed market assets reduces diversification benefits, making dedicated EM allocation less compelling for institutional investors
Climate transition risks in commodity-dependent EM economies (oil exporters, coal producers) could impair sovereign creditworthiness over 10-15 year horizon
Competition from larger EM debt managers (PIMCO, BlackRock, JPMorgan) with superior scale and local market access, particularly in frontier markets
Open-end mutual funds and ETFs offering daily liquidity versus closed-end structure, attracting flows during periods of EM optimism
Leverage amplifies losses during EM crises - the 0.37 Debt/Equity ratio means a 20% NAV decline becomes 27% decline to equity holders
Potential margin calls or forced deleveraging if NAV declines trigger covenant violations with lending banks
Concentration risk in specific countries (often 15-20% in Brazil or Mexico) creates single-name sovereign exposure that cannot be easily hedged
StructuralCompetitiveBalance Sheet