Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Lionsgate Studios is a pure-play content production and distribution company operating the Motion Picture and Television Production segments following its 2024 separation from Starz. The company produces theatrical releases (John Wick franchise, Hunger Games, Saw), television content for streaming platforms and networks, and monetizes a library of 17,000+ titles. The stock trades on execution of theatrical releases, streaming content deals with Netflix/Apple/Amazon, and library monetization amid industry-wide streaming profitability pressures.
Lionsgate generates revenue through upfront production fees from streaming platforms (cost-plus model with 15-25% margins), theatrical box office participation (50-55% of domestic gross after exhibitor split), international territory pre-sales that reduce production risk, and recurring library licensing income. Profitability depends on hit-driven theatrical performance, volume of streaming orders, and efficient cost management on $1.5-2.5B annual content spend. The company lacks owned distribution (no streaming platform post-Starz separation), making it dependent on third-party buyers and creating revenue volatility tied to release schedules.
Theatrical box office performance of major releases (John Wick, Hunger Games franchises) - $100M+ domestic openings drive significant upside
Volume and pricing of streaming content deals with Netflix, Apple TV+, Amazon - multi-year output deals provide revenue visibility
Library licensing revenue trends - recurring income from 17,000+ title catalog provides baseline cash flow
Content slate announcements and greenlight activity - signals future revenue pipeline and platform demand
Industry M&A speculation - pure-play content producer viewed as potential acquisition target for larger media conglomerates
Streaming platform vertical integration: Netflix, Amazon, Disney prioritizing owned content over third-party producers, reducing demand for independent content and pricing power
Theatrical window compression and direct-to-streaming releases eroding traditional distribution economics and backend participation
Talent cost inflation with A-list actors/directors commanding $20M+ upfront plus backend, compressing producer margins on tentpole releases
Franchise fatigue risk as John Wick and Hunger Games age without proven new IP to replace legacy franchises
Competition from larger vertically-integrated studios (Disney, Warner Bros Discovery, Paramount) with owned distribution and greater financial resources for talent bidding
Private equity-backed production companies (A24, Legendary) and tech platforms building in-house studios reducing third-party content orders
International content producers (UK, South Korea) gaining share with lower cost structures and local market expertise
Negative equity position (Debt/Equity of -0.12) and negative book value indicating complex capital structure post-Starz separation requiring monitoring
Current ratio of 0.46 signals working capital stress and potential liquidity constraints if theatrical releases underperform
Negative free cash flow of $100M+ requires external financing or asset sales to fund operations and content investment
Revenue decline of 12.5% YoY and net margin of -8.8% indicate profitability challenges requiring operational restructuring
moderate-high - Theatrical revenue directly correlates with consumer discretionary spending as moviegoing competes with other entertainment options during economic weakness. Television production less cyclical due to multi-year platform commitments, but streaming platforms reduce content orders during advertising slowdowns or subscriber pressure. International markets (30-40% of revenue) add GDP sensitivity across multiple geographies. Historical data shows 15-25% theatrical revenue declines during recessions.
Rising rates pressure valuation multiples for negative free cash flow growth companies and increase production financing costs (revolving credit facilities tied to SOFR). However, limited direct rate sensitivity as content production is not capital-intensive like infrastructure. Higher rates indirectly impact streaming platform content budgets as tech valuations compress and profitability focus intensifies, potentially reducing orders. Debt refinancing risk moderate given negative equity position suggests complex capital structure.
Moderate credit sensitivity. Production financing depends on revolving credit facilities and pre-sales to international distributors. Tighter credit conditions reduce ability to finance $150-250M tentpole productions and may force equity dilution or reduced slate size. Streaming platform financial health critical - if Netflix/Apple/Amazon reduce content spending due to credit market stress, production volume and pricing decline. Current ratio of 0.46 indicates working capital constraints requiring consistent cash conversion.
value/special situations - Stock attracts investors focused on post-separation restructuring story, potential M&A target valuation (0.9x P/S below peers), and turnaround from negative FCF to profitability. Recent 24% three-month return suggests momentum interest, but negative margins and declining revenue limit pure growth investor appeal. Requires tolerance for hit-driven volatility and balance sheet complexity. Not suitable for income investors given no dividend and negative FCF.
high - Entertainment stocks exhibit 30-40% higher volatility than market due to hit-driven revenue, quarterly lumpiness from release timing, and M&A speculation. Small-cap status ($2.5B market cap) and negative FCF amplify volatility. Recent performance shows 36% six-month gain but -3% one-year return, indicating significant short-term swings around restructuring narrative and franchise performance.
