Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Oklo Inc. is a pre-revenue advanced nuclear fission company developing small modular reactors (SMRs) and microreactors for commercial power generation, with its flagship Aurora powerhouse design targeting 15-50 MWe capacity. The company operates under a unique business model combining reactor deployment with fuel recycling capabilities, having secured a site use permit at Idaho National Laboratory and submitted the first-ever combined license application for a commercial advanced fission plant to the NRC. As of February 2026, Oklo remains in the development and regulatory approval phase with no operational reactors or revenue generation.
Oklo's intended model is to own and operate small modular reactors at customer sites under long-term PPAs (15-20 year contracts), selling electricity at fixed or inflation-indexed rates while retaining asset ownership. The company aims to achieve competitive economics through factory fabrication of standardized reactor modules, reduced construction timelines (estimated 12-18 months vs 5-7 years for conventional nuclear), and fuel recycling to minimize waste disposal costs. Competitive advantage hinges on NRC licensing success, proprietary liquid metal fast reactor technology enabling higher fuel utilization, and strategic partnerships with the Department of Energy for fuel supply and site access. Current $10.5B market cap reflects speculative valuation on future deployment potential rather than operational cash flows.
NRC regulatory milestones - combined license application progress, design certification status, and timeline clarity for first commercial approval
Customer contract announcements - signed PPAs with creditworthy offtakers (data centers, industrial facilities, utilities) providing revenue visibility
Fuel supply agreements and DOE partnership developments - access to HALEU (high-assay low-enriched uranium) fuel critical for Aurora reactor operation
Competitive positioning vs other SMR developers (NuScale, TerraPower, X-energy) on licensing timeline and commercial deployment schedule
Federal policy support - DOE funding, tax credits under Inflation Reduction Act, or legislative tailwinds for advanced nuclear
Regulatory approval uncertainty - NRC has never licensed a commercial advanced reactor design; approval timeline could extend 3-5+ years beyond company projections, exhausting capital runway before revenue generation
Fuel supply constraints - HALEU fuel production capacity in US is limited with only one domestic enrichment facility under development; supply chain bottlenecks could delay reactor deployment even after licensing
Technology execution risk - liquid metal fast reactor technology unproven at commercial scale in US; cost overruns, performance shortfalls, or safety incidents during initial deployment could be catastrophic
Competitive displacement - renewable energy plus storage costs declining 10-15% annually; by time Oklo achieves commercial operation (2027-2029 earliest), solar+battery may offer lower levelized costs for many applications
Established SMR competitors with regulatory head start - NuScale achieved first-ever NRC design certification in 2023, TerraPower has DOE backing and Bill Gates funding, creating 2-3 year licensing advantage
Incumbent utility resistance - traditional nuclear operators and utilities may prefer proven light-water reactor technology or view SMRs as unproven, limiting customer adoption
Hyperscaler data center captive solutions - Microsoft, Google, Amazon developing direct relationships with other nuclear vendors or investing in fusion startups, bypassing Oklo's energy-as-a-service model
Cash burn sustainability - with -$0.0B operating cash flow (effectively negative given pre-revenue status) and high fixed costs, company must access capital markets repeatedly; dilution risk if stock price remains depressed
No debt cushion - 0.00 debt/equity means no interest expense but also no access to lower-cost debt financing; equity dilution is only funding mechanism until revenue generation or project finance becomes available
Negative ROE of -12.3% and ROA of -6.1% reflect ongoing losses with no near-term path to profitability; extended development timeline could erode shareholder value significantly
moderate - As a pre-revenue development-stage company, near-term stock performance is more sensitive to regulatory/technical milestones than GDP. However, future commercial viability depends on industrial electricity demand growth, data center expansion, and corporate decarbonization commitments which correlate with economic expansion. Recession could delay customer PPA signings as capital projects get deferred, but long-term secular trends (AI power demand, grid decarbonization) provide counter-cyclical support.
High sensitivity through multiple channels: (1) Valuation - as a zero-revenue growth stock, Oklo trades on discounted future cash flows making it highly sensitive to discount rate changes; rising rates compress NPV of distant cash flows. (2) Project finance costs - nuclear projects are capital-intensive with 60-70% of levelized costs from upfront capex; higher rates increase financing costs and reduce project IRRs, potentially making PPAs less competitive vs alternatives. (3) Competitive positioning - rising rates hurt renewable energy economics similarly, but established technologies have lower risk premiums. Current 67.51 current ratio provides liquidity buffer but doesn't generate offsetting interest income at scale.
Minimal direct credit exposure given zero revenue and no lending operations. However, future business model depends on securing project finance (debt) for reactor construction and creditworthiness of PPA counterparties. Tightening credit conditions could impair ability to finance reactor deployments or reduce pool of investment-grade customers willing to sign 20-year power contracts. Current 0.00 debt/equity reflects pre-operational status but masks future leverage requirements for asset-heavy deployment model.
growth/speculative - Attracts thematic investors betting on nuclear renaissance, AI power demand, and decarbonization trends. High-risk, high-reward profile appeals to venture-style public market investors willing to accept binary outcomes (regulatory approval vs failure). Not suitable for value investors (no earnings, extreme P/B of 8.4x) or income investors (no dividends, negative cash flow). Momentum traders active given 34.3% 1-year return despite -30.3% recent drawdown.
high - Pre-revenue development-stage company with binary regulatory outcomes creates extreme volatility. Stock moves 10-20% on regulatory updates, partnership announcements, or sector sentiment shifts. Negative correlation with interest rates and positive correlation with uranium/nuclear sector ETFs. Illiquidity relative to market cap may amplify price swings on modest volume.
