More Utilities stocks
Compare equities side by side
Stocks breaking to new annual highs
S&P 500 oversold value screener
Relative strength momentum leaders
Upcoming earnings dates & reports
Filter and sort all 500 stocks
Continuous multi-factor scoring & catalyst forensics
Today's biggest gainers and losers
Ormat Technologies is a vertically-integrated geothermal power producer and equipment manufacturer operating 1,000+ MW of geothermal and recovered energy generation capacity across the US (Nevada, California, Hawaii), Kenya, Guatemala, Indonesia, and Honduras. The company uniquely combines power plant ownership (70-75% of revenue) with proprietary turbine/equipment sales to third parties, benefiting from long-term PPAs with utilities and stable baseload renewable generation that operates 24/7 unlike solar/wind.
Ormat generates stable cash flows from owned power plants operating under fixed-price or inflation-indexed PPAs with investment-grade utilities, providing predictable revenue streams. The electricity segment benefits from near-zero fuel costs (geothermal heat is free) with operating margins typically 40-50% once plants are operational. The product segment sells proprietary Ormat Energy Converter (OEC) technology globally, capturing higher-margin equipment sales but with lumpier revenue timing. Competitive advantages include 60+ years of geothermal expertise, proprietary binary cycle technology enabling lower-temperature resource development, and vertical integration reducing third-party equipment costs by 20-30%.
New PPA signings and project development pipeline additions (MW capacity under construction/development)
Electricity segment gross margin performance driven by plant availability rates (target 95%+) and O&M cost management
Product segment order backlog and timing of large turbine deliveries to third-party geothermal developers
Renewable energy policy developments including ITC/PTC tax credit extensions and state-level renewable portfolio standards
Geothermal resource performance at key facilities (Puna in Hawaii, Olkaria in Kenya, Nevada complex)
Capital allocation decisions between organic growth capex, acquisitions, and shareholder returns
Geothermal resource depletion risk - wells can experience declining steam production over 20-30 year plant life requiring expensive redrilling or supplemental wells, impacting returns on legacy assets
Technological competition from lower-cost solar/wind plus battery storage potentially reducing geothermal's baseload premium in PPA pricing, particularly as storage costs decline 10-15% annually
Regulatory and permitting risks for geothermal development including environmental reviews, water rights, and land use approvals extending project timelines 3-5 years
Geographic concentration with ~60% of generation capacity in Nevada/California exposing company to regional policy changes and seismic risks
Limited geothermal resource availability globally constrains addressable market versus solar/wind, with only ~15 GW of identified high-quality geothermal resources worldwide
Competition from larger diversified renewable developers (NextEra, Brookfield Renewable) with lower cost of capital and ability to bundle geothermal with solar/wind/storage in utility RFPs
Product segment faces competition from other geothermal OEMs (Turboden, Exergy) and potential customer vertical integration as technology matures
Elevated leverage at 1.10x debt/equity with negative free cash flow requiring ongoing capital markets access for $400-600M annual growth capex
Current ratio of 0.77 indicates potential near-term liquidity pressure, though project finance structures and revolver availability provide cushion
Exposure to foreign currency fluctuations on international operations (Kenya, Indonesia, Guatemala) with limited hedging on non-USD revenue streams representing ~20-25% of electricity segment
Tax equity financing structures for US projects create complex cash flow waterfalls and potential recapture risk if projects underperform
low - Electricity generation revenue is contracted under long-term PPAs with utilities, insulating 70-75% of revenue from economic cycles. Product segment has moderate cyclicality tied to global geothermal development activity and developer financing availability, but represents smaller revenue portion. Geothermal operates as baseload power with near-100% capacity factors, making output independent of economic demand fluctuations unlike merchant power generators.
Rising interest rates negatively impact Ormat through higher financing costs on project debt (typically 60-70% debt-financed at project level) and lower valuation multiples as investors rotate from yield-oriented utilities to bonds. Each 100bp rate increase raises financing costs ~$15-20M annually on new project debt. However, inflation-indexed PPAs (portion of contracts) provide partial offset. Rate sensitivity is elevated given negative FCF profile requiring ongoing capital markets access for growth funding.
Moderate credit exposure through counterparty risk on PPAs with utility offtakers, though most contracts are with investment-grade utilities (PG&E, Southern California Edison, Hawaiian Electric). Product segment has customer credit risk from international developers, particularly in emerging markets. Company maintains project-level non-recourse debt limiting corporate credit exposure, but relies on capital markets access for growth capex given negative free cash flow.
growth-oriented ESG/renewable energy investors seeking exposure to baseload clean energy with higher barriers to entry than solar/wind. The 89.6% one-year return suggests momentum investors have driven recent outperformance, likely on renewable energy policy optimism and utility decarbonization commitments. Negative FCF and elevated valuation (8.0x P/S, 18.8x EV/EBITDA) indicate growth premium pricing rather than value/dividend focus despite utility sector classification.
moderate-to-high - Stock exhibits higher volatility than traditional utilities given small-cap size ($7.6B market cap), growth stock characteristics, and sensitivity to renewable energy policy developments. Recent 38.4% six-month return demonstrates momentum-driven volatility. Beta likely 1.2-1.5x given renewable energy sector correlation and leverage to interest rate movements affecting growth stock valuations.
