New club opening pipeline and development timelines - each club adds $12-15M revenue at maturity with 8-12 annual openings driving 6-8% organic growth
Same-store membership growth and pricing - 2-4% annual membership growth plus 3-5% pricing increases drive mid-single-digit comparable club revenue
Club maturation trajectory - proportion of clubs in ramp phase (years 1-3) versus mature clubs (years 4+) significantly impacts consolidated margins
Real estate development opportunities - ability to secure premium locations in high-income MSAs with favorable lease or ownership terms
moderate-high - Premium fitness memberships are discretionary spending concentrated among upper-income households. During recessions, membership growth slows and attrition increases as households cut non-essential expenses, though affluent demographic ($150K+ income) provides buffer versus budget fitness. New club openings may be delayed if consumer confidence weakens. However, established clubs show resilience with 85%+ retention during downturns as fitness becomes habitual. Revenue declined approximately 15-20% during 2020 pandemic but recovered quickly, demonstrating both cyclicality and underlying demand strength.
Rising rates create dual pressure: (1) Higher financing costs on $1.9B debt (Debt/Equity 1.38) increase interest expense, though much is fixed-rate term debt limiting near-term impact; (2) New club development economics worsen as construction financing and capitalized costs rise, potentially slowing expansion pace from 8-12 clubs to 6-8 annually; (3) Valuation multiple compression as growth stocks re-rate versus risk-free alternatives - premium fitness trades at 15-20x EBITDA, sensitive to 10-year Treasury movements. Partially offset by owned real estate portfolio appreciating in value and providing refinancing flexibility.
Secular shift toward budget fitness and at-home digital workouts - Peloton, Apple Fitness+, and $10/month budget gyms create pricing pressure and question premium positioning sustainability, though Life Time's resort-amenity model targets different consumer
Real estate concentration risk - 85%+ owned properties provide cost stability but create illiquidity and exposure to local market downturns; difficult to exit underperforming locations without significant capital loss
Demographic concentration in high-income suburban markets - limits addressable market to top 20% of households and creates vulnerability if affluent spending patterns shift
growth - Investors attracted to 18% revenue growth, unit expansion story (8-12 clubs annually), and operating leverage as club portfolio matures. Premium to budget fitness multiples (2.2x P/S versus 1.0x for Planet Fitness) reflects growth expectations and asset ownership. Recent 105% net income growth and margin expansion appeal to growth-at-reasonable-price investors. High capex intensity ($500M annually) and modest FCF yield (0.8%) limit appeal to income investors. Story centers on multi-year runway to 250+ clubs and margin progression toward 20%+ EBITDA margins.
Trend
+15.5% vs SMA 50 · +21.2% vs SMA 200
Momentum
Volume distribution is neutral or leaning toward distribution. No compelling squeeze setup based on current money flow data.
Based on volume distribution analysis. Direct short interest data (short float %, days to cover) is not available in current data sources.
ANALYST ESTIMATES
Analyst consensus estimates · Actuals replace estimates as reported
| Year | Revenue Est. | Rev Gth | EPS Est. | EPS Gth | Range | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2023 | $2.4B $2.4B–$2.4B | — | $0.55 | — | ±1% | High6 |
FY2024 | $2.6B $2.6B–$2.6B | ▲ +8.6% | $0.72 | ▲ +30.6% | ±15% | High7 |
FY2025 | $3.0B $3.0B–$3.0B | ▲ +14.4% | $1.36 | ▲ +87.4% | ±1% | High6 |
INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP
LTH News
About
No description available.
| Symbol | Price | Day % | Mkt Cap↓ | P/E | Rev Grw | Margin | ELO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTH◀ | $33.74 | -0.06% | $7.5B | 19.4 | +1427.9% | 1247.5% | 1500 |
| $264.14 | -1.15% | $2.8T | 31.3 | +1237.8% | 1083.4% | 1521 | |
| $422.24 | -4.75% | $1.6T | 352.3 | -293.1% | 400.1% | 1507 | |
| $297.51 | -2.25% | $296.3B | 20.9 | +324.0% | 859.6% | 1477 | |
| $276.39 | +0.52% | $196.4B | 22.6 | +372.3% | 3185.0% | 1478 | |
| $147.43 | +0.05% | $163.2B | 30.2 | +711.9% | 910.0% | 1494 | |
| $218.42 | -2.32% | $122.3B | 18.3 | +312.2% | 771.2% | 1489 | |
| Sector avg | — | -1.42% | — | 70.7 | +584.7% | 1208.1% | 1495 |